half the hijackers were from SA, Bush was in tight with them, we did not go to war with SA. How does that even contradict your narrative?
they pop up on roll over, MB has had them since the 90s
I have probably seen as much evidence as you have, but your assertion that they did not use real planes is on the same wave length as all false flag events do not have real casualties. It is possible, but keeping that many people quite for this long seems a little hard to swallow. Yes there are numerous inconsistencies and yes it is highly likely they used a controlled demolition to take the buildings down (although they used to think it was an energy weapon), but that dos not mean they did not also crash planes into the buildings. It is way easier to actually kill people than to keep them quite, and this group has no issue with killing people.
why not just crash the planes then, CGI in 2001 would have been a huge risk, why take it?
That could be easily tested, I saw the thermite tests, the jet fuel in office space tests, why not jet fuselage into similar building?