>>22977350 PB notable (shameful)

>In Nov 1999, the Saudi Embassy paid for two employees to fly from DC in a dry run for 9/11 attacks

what a steaming load of un-sauced BULLSHIT

trying to deflect what we already know for certain…

ISRAEL, MOSSAD, and CIA carried out the attacks for their pal Silverstein

then used their MSM lapdogs to cover it up and sell the fake narrative to the stupid normies

now tell us how the saudis managed to get all of the MSM onboard to use CGI fakery to make it look like planes hit the WTC

and how they spoon-fed the american public the retarded cover stories and crushed everyone who questioned them

tell us about how saudis were able to do this bcs the sit in 99% of the executive positions in every fucking major media outlet

we're waiting……

then tell us the baker and the BO/BV aren't a cabal of coin-clipping baby cock sucking yids for putting this retarded trash into notables

>>22977515

nice…

but how TF does a US car maker sell a convertible in 2026 that DOESN'T have roll-bars?

>>22977520

>red herrings planted to disract and deflect

so when do the POS bakers, BO, and BV get rounded up for nuremburg 2.0?

and when do anons get control of QR back?

>>22977526

>How does that even contradict your narrative?

the hijackers were cia assets

the planes never got to NYC or DC

they were landed at USAF bases

the towers were brought down by controlled demolition

a cruise missile hit the pentagon

and another plowed a divot in a shanksville PA field

what would have been the need for SA to have a "dry run?"

>>22977530

>Make cars repairable again!

stop BUYING their shit

money talks, shit walks

>>22977532

>The building itself was haunted

yeah….

with asbestos

a ticking trillion-dollar liability looking for deep pockets to sue

>>22977542

>There's strong evidence that women's participation in security efforts makes countries safer.

three women can keep a secret if all three are dead

>>22977545

>but keeping that many people quite for this long seems a little hard to swallow

kek…

the passengers were liquidated

the planes themselves were photographed multiple times after 9/11 at airports around the world before they got around to changing the tail numbers

>It is way easier to actually kill people than to keep them quite, and this group has no issue with killing people

so why would you assume they didn't?

>>22977547

>why not just crash the planes then, CGI in 2001 would have been a huge risk, why take it?

bcs a real plane would have pancaked on the side of the bldg and fallen into the street below

a commercial airliner is essentially a flying empty beer can

the idea that one could cut a plane-shaped hole in a load-bearing wall of 2 inch thick corrugated structural steel is beyond laughable

>>22977550

a B-29 crashed into the empire state bldg…

barely broke a few windows

>>22977550

i don't need to stike a coffee cup with a sledge hammer to know what will happen

anyone with a modicum of engineering knowledge knew what would happen…

that's why cries of "BULLSHIT" started coming out as soon as the TV coverage began

ask my wife

i was on the telephone yelling at people

>>22977556

>The plane struck the building around the 79th floor, creating a large hole and causing a fire that spread over multiple floors.

the ESB was traditional construction…

steel skeleton INSIDE covered with a LIGHT façade

one would expect the façade of the ESB to be damaged

>Remarkably, the steel structure of the Empire State Building withstood the impact and remained standing

nothing "remarkable about it…

exactly what any structural engineer would have predicted

the WTC, on the other hand, was NOT built the same way

the outer wall WAS the structural steel skeleton, 2 inches thick

and buttressed on the inside every 10 feet by AN ACRE of concrete floor

a commercial jet, designed to be as LIGHTWEIGHT and FLIMSY as POSSIBLE

would do nothing more than scratch the surface

like your car hitting a concrete bridge abutment

pancake

>>22977568

>Fucking crazy how so many get so hoodwinked so easily.

the dumbing down of america

they didn't grow up building things with metal erector sets that had motors and gears that would bite your fingers

they had zero contact with physical reality beyond pushing a button on a video game

plus… they got a cellphone call from a plane in-flight in 2001

>>22977580

>Jet-Powered "Superbike For The Skies" Emerges

someone call evel knievel!!

he wanted to leave his mark on this world

(on the north face of the snake river canyon)

>>22977559

>>22977588

top kek!

nik'd

>>22977607

o7

GM

>>22977507

IBERIAN POWER OUTAGE: The sun was not to blame

Officials are still scrambling to understand the cause of this week's mysterious power outage in Spain and Portugal. It is already clear that space weather didn't do it. There were no solar flares, no geomagnetic storms, and no suspicious fluctuations in the solar wind before or during the outage.

https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=01&month=05&year=2025

>>22977507

A "HIGH INTEREST" RE-ENTRY

In 1972, the Soviet Union's Kosmos 482 spacecraft was supposed to land on Venus. More than 50 years later, it's returning to Earth instead. Touchdown is expected on May 10th, give or take a few days.

"This will not be your standard reentry," says satellite analyst Marco Langbroek, who has been tracking the object for years. "The Kosmos 482 Descent Craft was designed to survive the dense atmosphere of Venus. It will therefore likely survive reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere intact and make a crash landing. This will therefore be a high-interest reentry."

Kosmos 482 was part of the Soviet Union's successful Venera program to explore Venus. Between 1961 and 1984, thirteen Soviet probes successfully entered Venus's atmosphere, with ten landing on the planet's surface. Kosmos 482, however, never fully escaped Earth. After it was launched from the Baikonur Cosmodrome on March 31, 1972, the upper stage of its Molniya rocket shut down prematurely, leaving it in a 206 x 9802 kilometer orbit that has been decaying ever since.

"With an orbital inclination of 52 degrees, the Kosmos 482 Descent Craft could come down anywhere between 52 degrees north and 52 degrees south latitude," says Langbroek. "This includes much of south and mid-latitude Europe and Asia, as well as the Americas, Africa and Australia." Statistically, an ocean landing is the most likely outcome.

The probe was designed to parachute to the surface of Venus. However, it is very unlikely that the parachute system will work after more than 50 years in space, so this will be a crash landing. How bad will it be? Many details of the descent craft have been lost to history. Langbroek believes it is about 1 meter in diameter with a mass of ~495 kg. It won't do major damage, but you wouldn't want to be standing where it lands.

For updates and improved re-entry predictions, stay tuned to Langbroek's blog. And welcome home, Kosmos 482!

picrel: A museum replica of Venera 8, a similar probe launched just days before Kosmos 482

https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=01&month=05&year=2025

>>22977615

>stay tuned to Langbroek's blog

https://sattrackcam.blogspot.com/2025/04/kosmos-842-descent-craft-reentry.html

>>22977507

RED SPHERES IN THE NIGHT SKY

This has happened twice in the past week. On April 27th, David Blanchard photographed a red sphere over the countryside near Flagstaff, Arizona

He had seen an almost identical sphere three nights earlier on April 24th. "In each case, they faded after a minute or two," he says.

These spheres are caused by SpaceX. On both nights, SpaceX had launched batches of Starlink satellites from Cape Canaveral (Group 6-74 and Group 12-23). After deploying the satellites, the second stage of each rocket executed a deorbit burn over the US west coast, creating the red glow.

Why red? Fire is not involved. During deorbit burns, Falcon 9 second stage engines release about 400lbs of water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2). A complicated series of charge exchange reactions between those molecules and oxygen ions (O+) in the upper atmosphere produce photons at a wavelength of 6300 Å–the same color as red auroras.

In an earlier report on this same phenomenon, Stephen Hummel of the McDonald Observatory in Texas said "we are seeing 2 to 5 of these each month." Thats a lot of red spheres. If you live in the western US you might be be able to see some, too. Observing tips: Check the SpaceX launch schedule for night launches from Cape Canaveral. Deorbit burns occur about 90 minutes after liftoff.

https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=01&month=05&year=2025