Q saying that Sessions can't get involved because it would show he had "inside" info in a case he is recused from.
IT IS PUBLIC OPEN SOURCE INFO THAT RR SIGNED THE FISA - Obvious Conflict of Interest.
It was in the news - Sessions would not be accused of "inside" info on it.
So, this does not match up.
How long is the break?
Q
>Q saying that Sessions can't get involved because it would show he had "inside" info in a case he is recused from.
>IT IS PUBLIC OPEN SOURCE INFO THAT RR SIGNED THE FISA - Obvious Conflict of Interest.
>It was in the news - Sessions would not be accused of "inside" info on it.
>So, this does not match up.
'''Q - RR signing the FISA is out in the public!
Sessions would not need 'inside' info to have heard or seen that in the news.
He can just say that since he recused himself - he now finds it appropriate that RR do so too,
and let those not involved directly continue with the case.
So, this doesn't seem right to me.
Q - RR signing the FISA is not "inside" info.
It is open source in the News and everywhere.
So Sessions would not be accused of receiving "inside" info.
Sessions can just say since he recused himself, he feels it appropriate that RR recuse himself too.