>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
To make Rosenstein look like a deep state stooge
>Known beforehand?
OF COURSE.
>Optics.
Always matter.
>Think logically.
Look at the big picture
>Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
No
>What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
It would look like right vs left politics as usual in a DOJ that is supposed to be above the fray
>Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
Yes
>Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Yes
>Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Yes
>Think logically.
Sessions would appear to not be acting in good faith
>One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
That would be dishonest
>Who does Huber [directly] report to?
RR
>Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
No
>Why is this important?
Because RR is the one who was confirmed 94-6, not Sessions
>Why did Sessions recuse?
He's too unpopular with the left
>Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
No, because he recused himself
>What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
When POTUS is exonerated, it will be accepted by both sides because it will come from RR and RM
>POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
To reinforce the notion that RR and RM are his enemies
>Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
No
>When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
Of course!
>When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
Of course!
>Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
No way!
>LOGICAL THINKING.
Is rarely encouraged elsewhere
>Clickbait derails logical thought.
That's what the media does best
>Think for yourself.
It's still not illegal
>Trust yourself.
We're not wrong.
>Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
Suuuuuuuure he is.
>You have a front row seat.
In every sense of the expression
>Enjoy the show.
Yes sir!
>Q