Yea, this is a pretty good effort, fren Good on yer. It's nice to know what even just a language model like Grok thinks of the board. (Despite the potential bias of the programmers.)
It get's my nom, for what little my opinion is worth.
NOTABLE
Yea, this is a pretty good effort, fren Good on yer. It's nice to know what even just a language model like Grok thinks of the board. (Despite the potential bias of the programmers.)
It get's my nom, for what little my opinion is worth.
NOTABLE
This is confusing because here is the actual Bill as presented to the Texas Leg.
https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB366/id/3225652
Sec. 255.0015. REQUIRED DISCLOSURE ON CERTAIN POLITICAL
ADVERTISING CONTAINING ALTERED MEDIA; CRIMINAL PENALTY. (a) This
section applies only to a person who:
(1) is an officeholder, candidate, or political
committee;
(2) makes expenditures during a reporting period that
in the aggregate exceed $100 for political advertising, other than
an expense to cover the basic cost of hardware, messaging software,
and bandwidth; or
(3) publishes, distributes, or broadcasts political
advertising described by Subsection (b) in return for
consideration.
(Sorry for the REDDIT style faggotry. Not sure how this is gonna format out in the Board wild,…)
To be clear, not FOR/AGAINST the bill per se. Just so much bullshit out there surrounding it, I don't know who is jewing who anymore.
(kek)
Dude,…..just give it a rest.
We've all seen a million randos like you pop in here with this bullshit.
You'll provide a little entertainment SOME of us,……but eventually,……..you'll get the 'turd.