Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 8:34 a.m. No.22989956   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22989932

>supposed to be

Turns out the X-Twat Elon model is a much better one for diggs.

QR wisely outsourced it in order to Maxx Comfy things around here in the Post-ActiveQ era.

Long live the Newsbot/Shitpost era!

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 10:21 a.m. No.22990321   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0329 >>0363

>>22990312

TY Collector.

Now for the record, these are non-Baker Notes so they do not fall under the protection umbrella of Don't Fuck With PB's Shit.

Not saying anything is amiss here, just saying they can be modified later if need be.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 10:31 a.m. No.22990353   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22990334

>Trends Man Is Back!

Subscribe to my newsletter to learn just how fucked the current trajectory is.

Money well spent confirming what a shit sandwich washed down by precipiss it's all been lately.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 10:44 a.m. No.22990398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0418

>>22990360

>Shorter Grok

The only shit that works is doing all the cringey things nobody in the public likes except for the meme part.

You better hope Q is legit or maybe by the time your grandkids you never had hit your age things will be better.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 10:47 a.m. No.22990406   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0419 >>0420

>>22990363

Well, that Baker was in the wrong for using the Collector sanctity angle.

However, said Baker should have simply said (current) Baker's Choice not to do so.

That would be not only board legal, but also socially acceptable.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 10:56 a.m. No.22990430   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22990420

Indirectly, yes.

Baker's Choice is socially respected by the QR community at large.

So, if Baker said nah my choice to leave as-is, it's gonna prolly stick as ok.

The ball is in your court to get the fellow anons to agree that Baker is being super shilly and call for a QR BAKEOFF (heavily frowned upon by current mgmt so make sure you got good #'s on your side) to decide the case.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 11:31 a.m. No.22990558   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0561

>>22990548

Well mainstream/normie MAGA are going to stick around just for the lulz factor.

It's the Daydream Believer MAGA types that range from X-Twat Famefag followers on up through PTG/QR that are gonna get increasingly nowfaggy about the still able to walk down the street part.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 11:38 a.m. No.22990576   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0585

>>22990566

Well, here's the sitrep lazyfag who can't be bothered to at least glance at every post in a 6+ fucking hour long modern day QR General:

>oldfag admin Baker makes bread

>says outta here figure it out fags

>collector comes in for a 2 hour shift then leaves

>you start asking WTF are the Muh Notables dammit???

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 11:45 a.m. No.22990595   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22990584

Plus, it often ends up on Glowie Sniffer reports sent to Chuck.

>>22990585

I had (50) yesterday which was really just (17) back when Tumbleweeds and Vatty Spam weren't on the take it or leave it menu here.

Anonymous ID: cd8407 May 4, 2025, 12:04 p.m. No.22990653   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22990641

Glad you're finally here.

SP was false tagging Not_Toilet and some other anon I didn't recognize as being you earlier.

He needs to learn you're like the he shall not be named former BV that never left any doubt it was the real deal entering the room.