A cop ordering someone to stop talking is literally a federal crime, deprivation of rights under color of law, but they do it all the time. Why?
Side note, isn't she just a lovely little ray of sunshine? "My badge says I can!"
He should know. Just like cops, prosecutors, and judges should know, but they still violate the constitution every fucking day.
Performing a constitutionally protected activity, but "you can go to jail no questions asked", "I literally don't care" and "this isn't some free-will state".
Cops are VERY stupid and make very bad decisions, abusing the people and costing the taxpayers a lot of money.
Notice you talk shit about me for shining a light on THEIR criminal actions?
False.
And why aren't those propose or vote yes on such blatantly unconstitutional measures arrested?
US, We the PEOPLE.
Every PERSON is guaranteed due process in this nation as the constitution says. Imagine thinking as long as government says you're illegal you don't get due process. It's a bullshit concept and those pushing it know it.
Yes they do. Every PERSON gets due process, and anyone against that is an enemy to the Constitution and We the People it represents.
Do I seem worried to you about what others think of what I say?
That is a stupid argument. Does a murderer give their victim due process before killing them? So does that mean anyone accused of murder shouldn't get due process?
See >>22991752
You're free to try.
Oh so only crimes you say get due process.
What keeps government from claiming you're illegal?
See >>22991775
All cops in the United States have failed to uphold their oath and have either violated the constitution or stood by why others did. I do not mean all cops must be punished, but our nation must admit cops as a whole in the US violated our constitution.
*while
Wrong. All persons, not only citizens are guaranteed due process, otherwise government need only claim someone is not a citizen and deny them due process.
Remember, innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Due process.
Almost like the muhjoo shills switched to defending cops huh?
Every PERSON gets due process. Again, the idea only citizens get it is preposterous because then government need only claim any citizen isn't one and completely deny them due process of law.
Yet here you are, complaining about those calling out lawless cops.
You seem wholly incapable of understanding basic concepts.
All persons get due process, no matter how much you cry about it. Otherwise, government could easily claim any of us are not citizens and deny us our due process.
Treat the foreigner as yourself, not less than. They get the same due process.
Keep crying!!!
It is absolutely required by law, but the courts on down are violating our constitution and have been for a long time.
Everyone ignores the constitution until it's politically advantageous now and then they try to twist it to fit their own goals.
Yep.
Now why wouldn't they want people to get their day in court, unless they're afraid of what would be revealed?
Wrong. All persons in the United States are guaranteed due process, otherwise government need only declare you a terrorist to deny it.
Oh wait…
Who said He could do that?
Any law repugnant to the Constitution is void.
Perhaps you should read the constitution. Who said government gets to ignore the limits placed on government when government says so?
Who said they could? Again, any law repugnant to the constitution is void.
It's right there, they differentiate between citizen and person, citizens have other privileges, but every PERSON gets due process.
No, he can't. He is bound by the constitution, not the bullshit they came up with later.
I posted it too, and it clearly differentiates that citizens have extra privileges, but all PERSONS get due process.
>>22991957
What keeps them from saying it's fake? Illegals can have fake ID. There's a reason for due process, and the 14th makes it clear that all persons, not only citizens are guaranteed it.
I don't hate them, I hate what they do. If I hated them I'd want them all to die and burn in hell. I want them to repent and stop violating our laws, and simply admit they did it.
Attack the messenger when you can't attack the message huh?
No. They just defined any person born or naturalized as a citizen, mentioned privileges and immunities for citizens, then due process for all persons. They differentiated clearly hear, and they were always clear that all persons got due process. When I was young that was never even questioned, it was known.
Exactly.
See, you double down on attacking the messenger because you can't fight the message. The Constitution is clear.
Government has to prove you're not here legally (due process). If government gets to say "you don't belong here" without due process then they can do that to any of us.
Notice rather than argue against what I'm saying, you just name call. Attack the messenger when you can't attack the message.
No. Persons was not defines as natural born or naturalized, citizens were defined as persons that are natural born or naturalized.
>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
It is clear that no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, but it's also clear that "nor shall any State deprive anypersonof life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to anypersonwithin its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Citizens have extra protections, but all PERSONS get due process. It's extremely clear and it's being twisted on purpose.
So what stops them from claiming they have no records, or deleting them?
Every person is guaranteed due process, and is innocent until proven guilty. It is not up to the accused to prove innocence, it's up to the accuser to prove guilt.
Everyone gets due process so they have their day in court and it's not just governments word.
>defining persons as citizens.
No it doesn't, it defines citizens as persons natural born or naturalized. Work on your reading comprehension.
That's the thing, it's not up to you to prove you're legal, it's up to them to prove you're not. They do that by giving you due process and your day in court.
You don't have to be convicted of anything to be in a police database. I've never been convicted I know they have me in there because I saw them bring me up when I was talking to them about an incident I witnessed.
Are they just drawn to work in government or what?
I didn't ignore anything, you had no valid argument so you switched to personal attacks. I'm not ignoring anything, the 14th is very clear and you're misrepresenting what it says.
>All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
This defines citizens, not persons. It defines citizens as natural born or naturalized persons, so a subset of persons.
>No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States
Clearly, this is about citizens, the subset of persons that are natural born or naturalized
>nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
This is clearly applying to all persons, not just citizens.
Did they go before a jury? What exactly was their "day in court"?
Yeah, from what I've seen in videos some list you as "not police friendly" or "not cooperative with police" if you don't basically lick their boots.
Red tag the truck since there's no licensed driver. Give the driver due process.
Federally, for non commercial personal use anyone with a regular license can drive a commercial vehicle, such as a semi. Feds can only require it for actual commercial use. Some states still require a commercial license but federally it's not required for personal use.
>>22992297
>JUMP FOR JESUS [YOU] STUPID PIECE OF SHIT [NIGGERS]!
Then the devil took him to the holy city and had him stand on the highest point of the temple. “If you are the Son of God,” he said, “throw yourself down. For it is written:
“‘He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.’”
Jesus answered him, “It is also written: ‘Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’
>>22992316
Who are you callin' fake bitch? kek
I remember those bricks. I left one on top of the car once, got home, it was still there kek