>>22995727 pb
sounds entertaining.
didn't Musk say ~ "what's most entertaining is what will win?" or somesuch?
Remember when HRC instructed HUMA to remove the 'Top Secret' markers on her emails?
Are we having fun yet?
According to Grok there were three SCOTUS decisions granting 4th amendment protection to "persons" in the USA , in contrast to limiting those protections to citizens.
Grok gets the insider info on the ammunition of the opposition?
Turns out the SCOTUS ruled in the past that the 4th amendment applies to any person in the USA, not just to Citizens. That needs to be changed, overruled.
GROK:
Precedent: In cases like Plyler v. Doe (1982) and Almeida-Sanchez v. United States (1973), the Supreme Court affirmed that undocumented immigrants are “persons” entitled to constitutional protections, including against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Court has consistently held that presence in the U.S., regardless of legal status, triggers certain rights
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez (1990): This case suggested that Fourth Amendment protections may not fully apply to aliens without “substantial connections” to the U.S. However, lower courts and subsequent interpretations have generally extended Fourth Amendment rights to undocumented immigrants within U.S. borders, especially for criminal proceedings, unless they are at the border or in expedited removal processes
Limitations: The “border search exception” allows warrantless searches within 100 miles of U.S. borders, including airports, which can affect undocumented immigrants more frequently. Additionally, the exclusionary rule (suppressing evidence obtained unlawfully) is limited in immigration proceedings unless the violation is “egregious.”
Venezuelan Migrants Context: Venezuelan migrants allegedly acting on a mission from their government (e.g., Tren de Aragua gang members), the Fourth Amendment still applies to their detentions or arrests within the U.S. interior. Recent actions under the Alien Enemies Act (invoked by the Trump administration in 2025) rely on claims of national security threats. However, detentions must still meet Fourth Amendment standards of reasonableness and probable cause. A federal court in Texas ruled that the Act’s use against Venezuelan migrants did not meet the “invasion” requirement, and the Supreme Court has required habeas corpus access for detainees, ensuring judicial oversight.
Certainly the Constitution itself never intended for these rights to be given to non-citizens. Back in those day only men and white people had those rights? amitrite?
only two precedences, maybe I left one out or counted wrong.
Darwin's not what people think.
It's the neo-Darwin-ers who are f-ed up.
Freud made a deal with the devil at the beginning of his career and covered up the fact that the "hysterical" woman who were his patients had been molested by fathers or uncles or family friends, as children or tweens.
(and that's why they were messed up)
So he made up the lie that that woman only "wished" they had been seduced by their fathers, since when he tried to make it public he was blacklisted.
This was documented by a man who worked in the Freud archives with Anna Freud, who wrote a book on it.
He was subsequently defamed and attacked, had a long lawsuit with the New Yorker magazine (10 year long suit), and then withdrew to Australian to start life over again studying pets/ "The Emotional Life of Animals", since his reputation had been ruined by all the hater attacks, state-side.
Jeffery M. Masson
"The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory", published in 1984.
This was faked.
Trying to add proof to the BS Thermite / Thermate theory.
If I need to I'll dig out Dr. Judy Wood's book to prove it.
Probably too tired at the moment. She's amazing. Quite her, or anyone's If they could've done it, Magnum Opus.
She did it. Nobody else. And caught hell for it too.
Figures.
>This was faked.
I should write "staged" - which is a better descriptive.
It's not a shoop. It was staged.
I mislabeled this too; more like a crater, than a hole.
I think it was noted on this board immediately. So the date is probably in notables?
this seems right. But when I first saw a pic of it, it was against a wall?
Wasn't it?
>>22996984
Wait. isn't today the holiday in India of the Goddess who paralyzes enemies.
funny.
performed to invoke her powers of stambhana (paralysis or immobilization of enemies, obstacles, or negative forces), protection, and victory in legal or personal disputes.
Yes, today, May 5, 2025, is associated with Baglamukhi Jayanti, the celebration of Goddess Baglamukhi, a Hindu goddess known for her power to paralyze enemies and obstacles. Her name starts with a "B," and she is strongly associated with the color yellow, often depicted wearing yellow garments and adorned with yellow flowers and offerings. Baglamukhi is one of the ten Mahavidyas (Wisdom Goddesses) in Hinduism, revered for her ability to grant stambhana (the power to stun or paralyze) and protect devotees from enemies, legal issues, and debts. Recent posts on X confirm that Baglamukhi Jayanti was celebrated around this time, with some specifically noting May 4 or 5, 2025, as the date, aligning with the lunar calendar (Soma Ashtami).
This holiday involves rituals where devotees offer yellow sweets, marigold flowers, and turmeric, and wear yellow clothing to honor her. Temples dedicated to Baglamukhi, such as those in Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, see special worship on this day
It's Grok . Grok reads everything on X.
It's been a long wait for this.
It's a good day, today.
Wow. She's cuts off their tongue for laying. Savage.
It's actually a holiday today for them.
Laugh if you want.
Wow. She's cuts off their tongue forlying. Savage.
She gonna cream em. She gonna ream 'em.
Here she is with a crane? or what? A swan? Its' a Pelican!
they must have a guilty conscious if they fear people want to kill them?
As if people give a damn. Just keep out of Woman's bathrooms and Woman's sports.