>he tried to interrupt Trump a couple of times
Not one of these fuckers knows how to deal with POTUS.
They've never had anyone like him.
All they are used to is a bunch of dick suckers fluffing their way through the political realm.
Anon is lovin' it!
>We then guaranteed all PERSONS, not just citizens due process or law.
Dear sweet Jesus!
How many breads are you going to keep trying to push that bullshit.
The 14th makes it clear in the start that Persons = Citizens.
>removal of liberty
By that most everything that prevents one from doing what they will is a removal of liberty.
I need a fishing license to go fishing.
I have no money for that.
Therefore my liberty has been removed.
If one tries that avenue in court, they will fail.
At this point, (You) are just playing baitball.
>be the 1st to defend the pursuit of habbiness in the Supreme kangaroo court.
>the text is what it is, your interpretation (and the courts if they agree with you) is wrong
^^^ This
You won't change his/her mind, Anon.
He/she has been going on about this for days.
And not once provided proof that he/she is a Constitutional Scholar.
Sometimes credentials carry weight.
Don't you find it odd that over the past couple days of you beating your chest about "All Persons due process", that there appear to be no other Anons that stand in your corner?
>When you have to resort to insults
resorting to insults is when that is all there is in the statement.
Including insults is adding spice to the statement.
Two different things.
>One never stands alone when they tell the Truth.
It's your truth, and according to me, and apparently numerous others, your opinion.
Opinion isn't necessarily truth.
Why don't you Grok your "truth" and see how that plays out?
Ouch! Got me there, Anon!