>>23000045

the due process is them applying to enter and then either being granted or not granted that.

by them sneaking in they voided the process.

You are wrong.

it's wierd to me how when Democrat 'frens' break the law the democrats and marxists say 'fairness, racism, white privledge' but when the Republicans USE THE SYSTEM AS the democrats devised it to be the same democrats say 'oh, no, you're oppressing them' but ignore that the payouts of huge sums to enable these invaders OPPRESSES everyone who uses the process as it was designed to be used.

no, if the invader is sent packing wihtout giving a lawyer tens of thousands of dollars that is the correct way to proceed.

>>23000094

they violated process.

they voided the thing that you claim should happen.

did you scold them when they invaded and say 'you violated the due process, and now must leave'?

no.

you take whatever side is the Marxist talking point side. you don't care about those people, all you care about is enriching lawyers and creating a nightmare for INS.

>>23000119

are you going to do the 2nd grade game of just gainsaying whatever I say?

the process that was due was them applying to enter at a consolute or through the US government. Instead they skipped that and invaded.

if 1000000 solidiers from a foriegn nation showed up with guns and landed on a beach to invade would you say 'don't repell them, give them each a lawyer!'

anyway I'm not going to play 'automatic gainsaying' game with you any longer. You are incorrect and don't care about law but enriching your own clan, which is perhaps marxist lawyers.

>>23000398

sauce on 'bad'.

they just had a different way of seeing things and didn't worship at the franchise temple in Jerusalem.

your narrative is false.

provide sauce and prove me wrong.

>>23000445

'your ancestors'

wow.

you don't know me or my ancestors.