Was waiting for memes like that of her. Knew she'd get the Judge Dredd treatment.
Who's the bad guy in Casablanca? That's more a movie about character growth than struggle, in my opinion.
Think about it. If the AG tried to release Epstein information than one of the corrupt judges would come up with a bullshit ruling to stop it. Having O'Keefe release it stops any corrupt judge from messing with the DOJ. That's what it seems like to me. Heavy strategy in play.
Still not good guy vs bad guy, you're personifying an internal debate and ascribing antagonist to it. I don't see it like that.
No, they're not. That's all you see, that's what you're trying to tell everyone it is, define it, but that's not how it is and not how everyone sees it. Not every movie is straightforward good guy vs bad guy and trying to define all of them as such is narrow-minded and dishonest to the movies themselves.
Look, I gave an example, an agreed upon by many example, and you're constantly moving the goalposts to defend your argument, and then making demands from me. You're arguing like a DEI professor trying to convince me that a man can be a woman. I'm done with your slide. Later.
Because, uh, internal debates and character growth are not the personification of a bad guy, or the guy experiencing the change is not necessarily transforming from bad guy to good guy. And no airy poeticism about personification of concepts will ever convince me of that. Might make for a boring movie, but hey, that's just the road that argument takes. He's trying to pigeon-hole all movies into one trope, that's why he failed.
KEK. It's bots.
He went there when he said an internal debate is that. I have internal debates all the time and I don't consider that a tug-of-war between good and evil, good vs bad, good guy vs bad guy. You're trying to redefine what I said.
Because when I see them doing this to me for two years I think of all the little Zuckerbots that people are "going to fall in love with" doing it to kids.
Because, uh, the clowns claimed last night they needed to "up their game." Is the big masterplan upping of their game just arguing and sliding about movie tropes rather than imitating someone for attention? KEK!
No, someone saw a post on another platform other than youtube that made me think of this movie, made me remember that scene.
It's funny how the clowns posted memes about a religious group painting swastikas on buildings, and it was the far-left etching swastikas IRL. Funny how they accused of a certain religious group being kicked out of the country for degenerate and abusive behavior, and now it's the far-left being kicked out of the country for their degenerate and abusive behavior IRL. Ain't that some shit? KEK! Projected their evil onto someone they wanted to destroy and it just ended up exposing them as the problem, not who they whined and screeched for years who "it" is.
You know, for some reason your post made me remember that I've only read 2001 and 2010, and haven't even read a synopsis about 2061 or 3001. Two more to add to the queue.
There's an argument for using old tech that's reliable and doesn't fail and hardened to modern hacking methods just by the nature of their hardware, but floppies? Shopping on eBay? KEK! I heard of floppies in use years back even before this place, but the government shopping eBay for retro equipment replacements? Yeah, time to update that shit. Opening it up with modern equipment though is a pretty big surface area for attack compared to the old iron in use. But there's probably gov't hardened hardware that I have no clue about that they'll be using.
Fetterman hit pieces are launching him into a redemption arc.
Only ever seen it once when it first came out on VHS. Was a kid at the time so hard sci-fi didn't appeal as much to me as space operas like Star Wars did. Don't remember much of it, but the ending scene has stuck with me. Saw something on another platform that reminded me of it, posting the scene, an anon replied there are reaction videos of it on Youtube. Must have picked up on that somehow. I do that sometimes but I try not to.
>there is no chance that the people working on the system today are more competent or trustworthy than the people who designed and operated it fifty/sixty years ago.
There's also the argument that they are, from a tech perspective, but yeah I agree with you. To be honest, I'd be more concerned with the software in use. Windows? Yeah, you're just asking to be hacked. Linux/BSD/Solaris? Too daunting for some users. Really is a huge fuckin' project to modernize the system when you actually start thinking about it.
I mean, if it was up to me I'd go with a microkernel based system with a self-healing driverspace. L4 or QNX based, but then it'd be developed from scratch and that'd take too much time and cost too damn much. Gotta go with what's available, and like I said before, there's probably hardware available to build those systems that I'm not aware of.
>hardware available I'm not aware of
software available I'm not aware of, I meant to say
AI generated? It didn't even dent that sign.
It's funny watching the Discord trannies try to dominate a meme farming hole by spamming anime.