>>2300028 Investors want him stripped of his position and so do we all. Would also like to know that he was stripped for the jail entry search. Squat & cough, boy. Again!
>>2301780 That's Q SIR/MAAM to you, Pretender Marky. BTW, that is TFW you just dropped the soap at Folsom.
Talk about draining the swamp!!!
"In clear sight" → "in the clear"
meaning not encrypted
Some message(s) that Q has dropped here contain information "in the clear" that we have not yet figured out how to read/process/extract.
Method.
Select ONE image.
Get a stego program.
Do a dictionary attack trying to brute-force guess all passwords.
Will take forever.
Check the result on each one MANUALLY because how is the program going to determine whether the results are meaningful or not?
Now do the same for every image.
Not feasible.
Hypothesis: Q has hidden the password or passphrase in plain sight.
Or there is no secret message, it's just right there in the crumbs, and can be extracted by using the right method.
Correct. Ain't happening.
Assume Q wants us to be able to decode anything he has given us that's encrypted.
Therefore work backwards from that, he wants to make it possible for anons lacking the Federal Government's massive computing power to solve it. In due time.
So it must be something simpler than a brute-force dictionary attack to guess passwords/passphrases.