Anonymous ID: 174791 July 26, 2018, 4:11 p.m. No.2302389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2465

>>2300735

>>2300709

>>2300751

How about you use the software Q dropped for us and search ALL his posts with it? Search media post stills. ACTUALLY INVESTIGATE. https://guardianproject.info/apps/pixelknot/>>2300665

>>2300665

THINK MIRROR… PIXELKNOT… Things are not what they seem. There is a small Q within the perimeter of that manipulated O and fianter pale yellow where the line would come out. And it's a mirror of the meaning GUARDIAN. Using their own technology against them. Taking down the old guard from within with their own weapons. Even similar names.

>>2300709

Disgusting and disturbing notable from LB

 

>>2300861

>>2300735

>>2300861

???

 

 

>>2300953

 

THESE OPTICS

 

WOULD BE EPIC

 

Congress Has a Way of Making Witnesses Speak: Its Own Jail

 

DEC. 4, 2007

 

If the Justice Department refuses to enforce the subpoenas, as seems likely, Congress will have to decide whether to do so. Washington lawyers are dusting off an old but apparently sturdy doctrine called ((( “inherent contempt”))) that gives Congress the power to bring the recalcitrant witnesses in — by force, if necessary.

 

This is where inherent contempt comes in. From the Republic’s earliest days, Congress has had the right to hold recalcitrant witnesses in contempt — and even imprison them — all by itself. In 1795, shortly after the Constitution was ratified, the House ordered its (((sergeant at arms))) to arrest and detain two men accused of trying to bribe members of Congress. The House held a trial and convicted one of them.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/opinion/04tue4.html

 

SO MUCH GOOD STUFF IN PB. whoa. Good breads and work happening, Anons! Keep it up!