Using stegdetect, which gives me an "approximate" result – there can probably be false positive.
The file I mentioned however (hashed filename)
d879e4fd98e8922c194bd9a50f6ea4e5fa6da7a68331269372ba76714aa61b12.jpg
from post
07-Jan-2018 22:03:47
definitely has stuff in there, and it appears non-encrypted, since I could see the PK signature and contained filename.
So actually anyone can have a look at the file and give it a try.
Original filename (in the mentioned post) was "Inkedq_LI.jpg"
I have little experience with stego, as I am no pedo muthafucka/pervert and never had this serious of a need to hide data/messages …
So I don't know what you mean with ft decoder – "ft" would (trivially) mean Fourier Transform to me … lol
From what stegdetect gives me, for encrypted stego, there's "outguess" & "jphide". The stegdetect package itself has some decryption as well.
Pixelknot appears to be for android only, from what I found out (but may be wrong).
Many of the GUI-variants just use the same libraries/algorithms as jphide & outguess.
But there's certainly more, which I am not aware of currently …
For un-encrypted, and simply appended data in images, standard tools like hexdump, dd & od will probably suffice …
Will look into that further, and could post results from stegdetect for all images in a pastebin if other anons want to look into that.
Ooops, see – didn't even manage yet to read today's Q posts except the first one …
So, yes, in that case I'd better find a solution to get myself a pixelknot running … lol. Thanks!
Lol. Tits or GTFO – you know the deal.
Had been looking into that "chalice" of yours, and to me, and until you or someone else finds something in it, it's nothing but the facebook video of one famefagging guy called pulaski