dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Whoever had control of the “AUTOPEN” is looking to be a bigger and bigger scandal by the moment. It is a major part of the real crime, THAT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OF 2020 WAS RIGGED AND STOLEN! Millions and millions of people knew that, but the Radical Left Democrats waged a campaign of inoculation and innocence like none that had ever been waged before. THIS IS WHY THE UNSELECT COMMITTEE OF POLITICAL THUGS, WHO WERE GIVEN A FULL AND COMPLETE PARDON BY THE PERSON WHO WIELDED THE NOW ILLEGALLY USED AUTOPEN, DELETED AND DESTROYED ALL EVIDENCE AND INFORMATION FROM THEIR CORRUPT AND VICIOUS WITCH HUNT AGAINST ME, AND MANY OTHER PEOPLE, WHOSE LIVES WERE COMPLETELY SHATTERED AND DESTROYED BY THIS HISTORICALLY CRIMINAL EVENT. Remember, it all began with DIRTY COP James Comey, Obama, a hapless and cognitively impaired Sleepy Joe Biden, and my now very famous ACCUSATION that,“THEY SPIED ON MY CAMPAIGN!” Whoever had control of the Autopen is just the beginning. The biggest crime of all is that THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WAS RIGGED! I (MAGA!) WON THE ELECTION BY MILLIONS OF VOTES, AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT. GOD BLESS AMERICA, FOR THE FIGHT HAS JUST BEGUN!!!

May 17, 2025, 8:34 AM

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114523195208653918

>>23045904

HOLY SHIT

@Q anon76⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️®️

@Qanon76

17

May 17, 2025,3:39AM

https://truthsocial.com/@Qanon76/posts/114522033110863061

>>23045910

WE ARE HERE

Anonymous ID: d57832 May 17, 2025, 7:40 a.m. No.23045971 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>5979

>>23045910

>>23045971

What is this shield's meaning?

Anonymous ID: d57832 May 17, 2025, 7:46 a.m. No.23045993 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6023

By Conservative Patriots — May 15, 2025

Supreme Court Broadens ‘Unreasonable Force’ Claims Against Police Officers

In a unanimous ruling Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court took a major step toward clarifying how claims of excessive force against police officers are evaluated, reaffirming a legal approach that takes into account the entirety of an officer’s encounter—not just the split-second moment of perceived threat.

The 9-0 decision comes from a 2016 case out of Texas, where 24-year-old Ashtian Barnes was shot and killed by Officer Roberto Felix Jr. during a routine traffic stop. Barnes had been driving his girlfriend’s rental car, which had outstanding toll violations, when he was pulled over. When the vehicle began moving as Felix stood on the door sill, the officer fired two shots, fatally striking Barnes.

At issue was whether the court should assess the officer’s actions solely based on the final moment when he feared for his safety or evaluate the broader chain of events leading up to the shooting. Writing for the majority, Justice Elena Kagan emphasized the importance of context.

“To assess whether an officer acted reasonably in using force, a court must consider all the relevant circumstances, including facts and events leading up to the climactic moment,” Kagan stated.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh also penned a concurring opinion, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett, further solidifying the Court’s message that law enforcement accountability must reflect the full picture—not isolated snapshots.

The decision is a crucial affirmation of due process and responsible policing, ensuring that courts don’t ignore the high-stakes complexity that officers face on the ground. Conservatives have long advocated for judicial clarity on police use-of-force standards, particularly amid ongoing attempts by the radical left to undermine law enforcement through selective prosecution and politically motivated narratives.

In a separate but equally significant development, the Supreme Court earlier this week declined to take up two challenges brought by energy-producing states and oil companies facing an onslaught of climate change lawsuits. The decision allows lawsuits against major fossil fuel companies—spearheaded by Democrat-controlled state and local governments—to proceed in state courts.

Critics argue that these lawsuits are not about justice or environmental protection, but about using litigation as a backdoor to impose left-wing energy policies rejected by the American people.

“Consumers are not helped by these cases, which seek to wipe products from store shelves and funnel money to left-wing causes,” said O.H. Skinner, executive director of the Alliance for Consumers, a consumer watchdog group.

Skinner added: “Here is hoping the targets of these lawsuits continue to fight these cases, as they have consistently prevailed in the final stages of review, and that is the only way for consumers not to be sacrificed before the left-wing onslaught here.”

The Alliance for Consumers previously released a report exposing a vast network of dark money behind the lawsuits—pointing to progressive nonprofits bankrolled by undisclosed donors working in tandem to reshape America’s energy landscape through judicial activism.

Adam White, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, echoed concerns about judicial overreach replacing the will of the voters. “I hope that the Court will hear the issue someday, for the sake of constitutional accountability and the public interest,” White said.

According to experts, if these lawsuits succeed, energy producers may face billions in penalties—costs that would inevitably be passed on to working Americans through higher gas prices, energy bills, and reduced domestic production. Worse still, the endgame is clear: climate activists hope to use these court victories to implement elements of the Green New Deal through litigation rather than legislation.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, previously advised the Court to let the lawsuits proceed at the state level, demonstrating once again the current administration’s hostility toward American energy independence and its willingness to bypass Congress in pursuit of an extremist climate agenda.

President Donald Trump has long criticized these kinds of legal maneuvers, defending American industry and energy workers against what he calls “environmental socialism” disguised as legal reform.

With the 2024 election looming and energy costs continuing to rise, the battle between constitutional governance and activist rule-by-lawsuit is far from over.

https://www.libfails.co/supreme-court-broadens-unreasonable-force-claims-against-police-officers/

Anonymous ID: d57832 May 17, 2025, 7:51 a.m. No.23046010 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6167

>>23045910

Q

12/13/2017 00:28:32

8chan/cbts: 86111

Anonymous

12/13/2017 00:22:14

8chan/cbts: 86037

Q has asked about ownership of voting machines before. They knew GS was going to mess with the numbers. This was the plan.

A VERY SPECIAL PLACE!!

What would be the penalty for stealing elections?

>>86037

>>23045885

notable

>>23045911

good

Anonymous ID: d57832 May 17, 2025, 8:01 a.m. No.23046053 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>6374

>>23045913

omg, that's john

>>23045949

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtOvBOTyX00

Heart beats fast, colors and promises

How to be brave? How can I love when I'm afraid to fall?

But watching you stand alone

All of my doubt suddenly goes away somehow

[Pre-Chorus]

One step closer

[Chorus]

I have died every day waiting for you

Darling, don't be afraid

I have loved you for a thousand years

I'll love you for a thousand more

[Verse 2]

Time stands still, beauty in all she is

I will be brave, I will not let anything take away

What's standing in front of me

Every breath, every hour has come to this

[Pre-Chorus]

One step closer

[Chorus]

I have died every day waiting for you

Darling, don't be afraid

I have loved you for a thousand years

I'll love you for a thousand more

And all along, I believed I would find you

Time has brought your heart to me

I have loved you for a thousand years

I'll love you for a thousand more

See pop shows near London

Get tickets as low as $53