Answering a Familiar Question with a Current Example 1/3
May 18, 2025 | Sundance |
I often hear or receive this question in various iterations. When discussing the research outlines of current events, especially when we cite the historic background of what took place leading to those events – and how it created the outcome we now witness, we often get this question – or a version therein:
…”Have you tried to meet with DNI or DOJ or NSC people to attempt to ”unsilo” their thinking and understanding of all that transpired so they can connect all the dots. You have said that different people you’ve spoken to know pieces and parts, but the silos prevent anyone from knowing the whole. Can you not be the link? I love that we know but we can’t affect change. We/I only become more frustrated as our new leaders bumble along talking and focusing on seemingly trivial things compared to the Treason that has been on display since 2008.”….
My friends, part of the reason the corrupt DC system is so transparently predictable,is precisely because everyone engaged in the events has a vested interest to retain the corruption. When you peel down the onion, when you get through the smoke to the fire, when you go deep into the rabbit hole and finally reach the dead end,you discover the root of everything that permeates everything is money. It is not ideology – it’s money.
From my myriads of travels and interactions with the system operators, I can boil down the answer to a few key points:
♦First, to the point of those we count on to stop the corruption, these are not smart people. You project infinitely more intelligence upon them than they actually possess. The high-information voter and researcherhas much more knowledge than they do.We fail and become frustrated when we mistakenly believe they carry an awareness that is factually not present. You know more than your representative, and you know the context of that information at a much, much higher level than they do. They ARE NOT smarter than you; where “they” applies to every-single-one of the names you might reference.You are smarter than them.
♦Second, corruption is a business; whether in the initiation of it, or in the maintenance of it. Quoting myself in discussion of the situation: “My honest and respectfully intended question to you would be: What is it that makes our representatives always want to “talk about the information”rather than act upon the information, when the information is there for the taking?
Perhaps, by training, by habit, or by unintended consequence our representative form of government,our American system of politics, has developed to live for the process itself as an end result. Is it logical to believe that removing corrupt activity is a discussion; the conversation is the point; the smoke is the fire?
The business of Washington DC has evolved into reveling in the processand, as a consequence,it completely ignores the end point, misses the bottom line, doesn’t actually SEE the subject matterand never actually applies action to what might be discovered. In fact, I’m led to believe that sometimes those within system avoid the corruption deliberately, because if they get their heads around it and nail it home, they won’t have anything to talk about anymore–nothing to fundraise from anymore-because they will have exhausted their stash.
Washington DC has gotten into the habit of milking every example of corruption for “so many talking points,” “so many interviews,” “so many column inches,” and “so many angles” thatproblem-solving does not appeal to them at all. They oddly appear to favor the endless process.
So, when there’s an approach like what they encounter with me, with our significant research, and our reluctance for self-involvement or financial benefit, well, I just don’t fit in–because I don’t give a flying flip about “the process.” And therefore, I do not fit into the rationale of the box or their predicted PERT chart. And I say this having been a target of their stupid investigative nonsense.
♦Third, and this is the one that hurts; as long as the money is flowing – they really don’t careabout the consequences outside the bubble of corruption that surrounds them. This is where the “pretending not to know” aspect becomes a matter of importance to retain position.
They built the silos as aself-preservation system, where what they are preserving is their access to money. The examples of corruption that flow like an endless stream around the silos, the feeder material for the DC swamp is simply an outcome of their own creation.
Perhaps it is better to give you an example FROM TODAY as to how this applies to what we review. All three points noted above will be visible in this example…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/05/18/answering-a-familiar-question-with-a-current-example/