Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 5:34 a.m. No.23053907   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3913

>>23053894

You'll never be who you've been imitating for two years, but it's obvious you so very much want the reputation of who you imitate. You have to pretend to be someone that doesn't pretend. You just prance around for attention off of someone else's meme rotations.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 5:47 a.m. No.23053929   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3936

>>23053922

Remember when POTUS Trump said that he believes Obama's birth certificate was legit at the start of his first term? Same optics. Why would they give the deep state media talking heads on the damned networks something to use to smear? Try logic for a change.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 5:54 a.m. No.23053949   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3966

>>23053931

Why do you assume they're misleading and not getting their ducks in a row? It's been 4 months and you expect them to go through all the evidence that was hidden from them that they never got to see until they were appointed? Use your fucking head instead of trying to incite a crowd with a weak division focal point.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:03 a.m. No.23053964   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23053958

How does that even answer the question you were asked? You behaved like a kid, I asked if you always devolve to acting like a kid and you respond with a song with the chorus states leave the kids alone? No, act like a retard here and I'll treat you like you're a retard.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:08 a.m. No.23053969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3997

>>23053966

>Then why do the fucking interview?

Transparency

>They knewdamned well Epstein would come up.

You're familiar with what they knew and what the interviewer was going to ask? There's no proof they knew.

>They could have told Maria beforehand, "Epstein off limits".

Then it wouldn't have been an honest interview if they're setting the terms before the interview like how Biden used to. Guess they should have just gave Bartiromo the questions to ask then, right?

>The interview was not positive. Bongino was defensive as fuck, and KASH pretty much never changed emotions.

So you're doing an emotional analysis rather than a logical analysis. I thought the interview was postiive, Bongino wasn't defensive, seemed more to me like he was holding back, and Kash seemed like he always does. Two different views of the same interview, though mine isn't slanted towards negativity and smearing.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:31 a.m. No.23054026   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054014

>We (anons) do not have the info that those running the show have. It's not going to happen on "our" schedule, but theirs.

Yep. It's not going to be like every other time where when the good guys get in charge and sit on the information and do nothing with it. It's going to be different this time, I have no doubt, but it may not be what everyone expects, that has to always be kept in mind as well.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:36 a.m. No.23054034   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

I like how the punishment for not staying within the imaginary boundaries of acceptable anonymous behavior cultivated by satanist and marxist .edu and .gov logins is they imitate you with perverted caricatures and try stealing everything they can from you while they use the same attack patterns that are used on an entire religious group.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:42 a.m. No.23054059   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054037

>Q posts are useless here

Why do you say that? Some anons' whole identities are built around re-posting Q drops, trying to find any relation to tweet timestamps that they can, all the while trying to present the appearance of being experts, and everyone is supposed to trust the experts, right? When you've gone over them all over a dozen times over half a decade, some anons don't see the need to continually post them or obsess over them, just took the information from them and added it to their knowledge to access from time to time when needed or appropriate. Quit whining too. The board has been under heavy attack for years, what you see left is the best of what's left, the toughest anons and the most deranged shills.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 6:52 a.m. No.23054100   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Really is kind of weird thinking about it like that though. I've never really been the best at anything. I don't see myself like that. To be included along with those here that are thoughโ€ฆ that's kind of a mindfuck.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 7:04 a.m. No.23054164   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054155

>Go back to Reddit you retard.

Just a word of advice, if you're going to try and shame someone with that phrase, at least don't use the spacing from that site while you do it. It's like accusing someone of theft while you have red pistachio dye on your hands.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 7:13 a.m. No.23054213   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4225

>>23054194

>then the plan is darkness rather than light.

Want to know more, then get a job where you get to learn more, but then if that's your goal for getting that job then you're not the best candidate for that job. National security exists for a reason. I don't know about you but I'm not bitching about going from 100% in the dark to having 40% of the picture, and I can't even claim to have a full grasp on everything in that 40%.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 7:43 a.m. No.23054379   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054370

Yes, you can. It's not viewed as good grammar, but you can. And I do it all the time, more for a longer pause than using an ellipsis or comma seeing as I try writing verbatim how I actually speak, including all the "uh's" and "um's".

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 7:51 a.m. No.23054422   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4431

>>23054407

Has nothing to do with hate and everything to do with a complete lack of interest. Getting likes on social media is not impressive to me, even if the like comes from a celebrity, nor is it something to strive for or brag about. It's not "clout" you're flaunting, it's desperation for attention and validation from others.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 7:57 a.m. No.23054444   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054431

>If you were not interested at all, you wouldnโ€™t have replied to him in the first place.

You think you get to define my motivations, one post? What's the matter, imitating me isn't enough for your malignant ass? Same old fucking argument, every damn time. Anyway, let's address that again, shall we? I wasn't interested in his like or his brag, but that doesn't prevent me from calling him out on what he was doing now, does it? I wasn't mocking either, I was dimissing.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 8:05 a.m. No.23054490   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4497

KEK. He IP hopped! So mighty and powerful that requires forced visilbility, compelled listening, deception, and impersonation to post "truth." And if anyone questions his "truth" they're targeted for destruction and harassment. Pretty weak "truth" that it needs people paid to post to maintain it. Fragile little clowns make me laugh.

Anonymous ID: 8ec026 May 19, 2025, 9:13 a.m. No.23054731   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23054723

You really are a retard if that's your reflex to call someone that disagrees with you. Also shows the worth of your "truth" if it requires forced visibility, compelled listening, deception, impersonation, and the destruction of anyone that questions it. That's propaganda, bud, and doesn't carry any water here. You're fighting for the chaos you created and rage and seethe and cry about the order that established here itself because of your evil.