>>23054918

ah ha ok. The CIA and only the CIA is picked out like this, is impossible to clean and will be dismantled.

anon was wrong about that, but right about everything else.

The plan is going to keep the structure of society. Cant have wild west civilians trying to make arrests.

unless you organized and trained them ofc. And gave them the legal authority to arrest, search and seize. And a uniform so they could be identified. And wrote laws to cover and restrict their actions. Maybe give them a shiny badge to indicate that legal authority.

Then civilians could police each other.

>>23054913

But you do say 'ALL'. Ive seen it too.

and yeah that's a deep state trigger.

But Ill give you a chance to clear that up for the rest of us.

In your opinion, do ALL cops violate the Constitution, or do SOME cops violate the Constitution?

>>23054927

See

>23054931

and stop attributing intent to me that I didn't say.

>>23054931

>>23054913

Its a simple enough question that would solve you guys arguing every day. And us having to see it.

In your opinion, do ALL cops violate the Constitution, or do SOME cops violate the Constitution?

>>23054948

All or some? simple enough, you don't need to try to quantify it like a politician because you know if you say the thing you want to say, it would be wrong.

All or some?

All or some?

>>23054952

All

or

Some

?

>>23054958

No, you figuratively gave a politician's rambling and sidesteppping explanation.

In your opinion, do ALL police violate the Constitution or do SOME police violate the Constitution. It is an either/or question.

the only other part of the question is 'do NO police violate the Constitution?' I can add that if you need it.

Do ALL police violate the Constitution, Do NO police, violate the Constitution, or do SOME police violate the Constitution?

Those are the only choice, not because i defined the parameters of the question, but because there is a finite set of groups of numbers of police. All, some or none.

>>23055010

Bad cops can be turned into pillars of salt, ngl, and anyone protecting them. But good people dont get punished for the sins of others, either under this life's laws, or the next's.

>>23055036

As a whole.

Are you saying that is 'ALL' cops? you are defining them to be equal?

As a whole =ALL?

Just clarifying.

and you're not being perfectly clear. so to get to the bottom of your argument, we have to define terms. You do not use precise language so that's making it more difficult.

Again Im asking, are you saying that

"As a whole' equally means 'ALL'

>>23055052

yes. i do.

hows your Monday going so far?

>>23055199

haha

SOME

ALL

or

NONE

returns.

You're the only one that didn't understand the assignment.

MOST is still not 'ALL'. You are the only one that uses 'ALL'

>>23055202