TYB!
So when is President Trump shattering the FBI into a thousand pieces again?
They plant evidence: 2015 Playpen "Network Investigative Technique" proves they can put anything on a target's computer.
A nearby police officer is being investigated for having "illegal images".
Did you know that 18 U.S.C. § 2252A requires evidence gatherers to gather NO MORE THAN 3 PIECES OF EVIDENCE, to promptly hand it over, and to destroy any remaining copies?
That doesn't sound like the right way to gather evidence, to me.
That does sound like a way to cover up the crimes of pedophiles in high places, who may have investigators slowly gathering the evidence to strike when the time is right, like proper investigators do.
Anon speaks up about this and suddenly the torches and pitchforks are pointed in anon's direction.
Wife says "anon you gotta live in this community."
She has a point.
There are edge cases. Not everybody accused of a crime is guilty of it. And this 'crime' has a whole bunch of holes in it.
For what other crime is the gathering of evidence made illegal?
Anon wants none of it, to be clear, just as anon wants no snuff porn films like Faces of Death. Criminalizing someone for gathering evidence is wrong.
If they prove he paid for it? Does that make it wrong?
Is anon's stance that in order to jail him, Constitutionally, that they need to show he committed actual physical harm – is anon, wrong?
Anon could be wrong. Anon was told that the First Amendment was said not to include yelling fire in a crowded theater but anon looked that up and it has changed, those laws were said to be unconstitutional. So, that changed.
Anon can change. The law can too.
Anyway, wondering. Thank you.