Why does Rumble take 1 minute to start a video?
>It's National Lucky Penny Day!
Is this a Jewish holiday?
Supreme Court temporarily allows Trump administration to shield DOGE documents
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday temporarily allowed the Trump administration to shield Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from freedom of information requests seeking thousands of pages of material.
Chief Justice John Roberts issued an administrative stay that puts lower court decisions on hold while the Supreme Court considers what next steps to take.
For now, it means the government will not have to respond to requests for documents and allow for the deposition of the DOGE administrator, Amy Gleason, as a lower court had ruled.
At issue in the ongoing litigation is whether DOGE, which has played a key role in firing government workers and cutting federal grants and spending, is technically a government agency and therefore subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which allows members of the public to seek internal documents.
The Trump administration says that, despite its name, DOGE is merely a presidential advisory body that is not subject to public records requests under FOIA.
Further complicating matters, when DOGE was set up, it effectively took the place of a previous government entity called the U.S. Digital Service. The Trump administration now refers to the body as the U.S. DOGE Service, or USDS.
The case arose when watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) brought a freedom of information request in January soon after Trump took office seeking information about DOGE. CREW later filed suit.
In March, U.S. District Court Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington ruled DOGE is “likely” covered by FOIA and that “the public would be irreparably harmed by an indefinite delay in unearthing the records CREW seeks.”
Cooper ordered DOGE to process CREW’s several FOIA requests for information on an “expedited timetable” and to begin producing documents on a rolling basis “as soon as practicable.” The court also ordered the government to preserve “all records” that may be responsive to CREW’s FOIA requests.
In addition to the more than 100,000 documents the Office of Management and Budget has that are responsive to the FOIA request ordered by Cooper, DOGE itself said it has approximately 58,000 documents responsive to the request.
The documents in question all relate back to the question of whether DOGE is a government agency.
CREW's lawyers said in court papers said that Cooper had merely issued a "narrowly-tailored discovery order" to ascertain whether DOGE is a federal agency. The Supreme Court, they added, "rarely intervenes in ongoing discovery disputes" and there was "no basis for such extraordinary intervention here."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-temporarily-allows-trump-administration-shield-doge-docu-rcna208628
UK Telegraph sold for $700 million
Ownership of The Daily Telegraph, the storied British newspaper long considered close to the country’s Conservative Party, is poised to change — again.
RedBird Capital Partners, an American investment firm, said on Friday that it reached an agreement in principle to buy control of the newspaper’s parent company, Telegraph Media Group, at a valuation of 500 million pounds, or about $675 million.
Friday’s deal marks the latest twist in a long-running takeover drama for The Telegraph, which for much of its 170-year history has been considered a house organ of sorts for Britain’s Conservative Party. (Among its nicknames is The Torygraph.)
RedBird had already bought control of the newspaper via a joint venture with International Media Investments, a fund controlled by a member of Abu Dhabi’s royal family. Under that plan, the newspaper would have been overseen by Jeff Zucker, the former president of CNN.
But that deal was blocked in 2023 after an outcry in Parliament over foreign state ownership of British media assets. Last year, the Conservative-led government passed a law barring foreign state investors from owning British newspapers.
The joint venture, known as RedBird IMI, retained control of The Telegraph while soliciting other bids.
Following the collapse of RedBird IMI’s plan, other media moguls were reportedly considering bids for the newspaper. The most ardent was Dovid Efune, the British-born owner of The New York Sun, though he had struggled to line up financing ahead of a deadline late last year.
The Spectator, an influential magazine that was part of the same holding group as The Telegraph, was sold for £100 million last year to Paul Marshall, a British hedge fund tycoon with media interests that include the right-wing TV channel GB News.
As part of Friday’s deal for The Telegraph, RedBird will buy the majority of its Emirati partner’s holdings, though IMI is expected to retain a small stake, pending a change in the foreign ownership law.
The current government, led by the Labour Party, announced last week that it would relax that restriction, allowing foreign state entities to own stakes of up to 15 percent in newspapers. It cited the importance of attracting investment in the news media. That opened the door for the revised RedBird offer, since IMI is a minority investor in its consortium.
RedBird said it was in talks to line up British investors as minority owners “with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of The Telegraph.”
The 11-year-old RedBird is a well-known media investor, whose holdings include stakes in the movie studio Skydance Media; Fenway Sports Group, which owns the Boston Red Sox baseball team and the British soccer club Liverpool F.C.; and the New York Yankees’ regional sports network.
The investment firm said it planned to expand The Telegraph’s international footprint, “particularly in the United States,” as well as its digital operations.
“We believe that the U.K. is a great place to invest, and this acquisition is an important part of RedBird’s growing portfolio of media and entertainment companies in the U.K.,” Gerry Cardinale, the founder of RedBird, said in a statement.
https://archive.is/ALsU0#selection-667.0-759.239
Crime Rates of Illegal Migrants Underreported
Democrats actively oppose the Trump administration’s efforts to arrest and deport illegal immigrants, despite the administration’s focus on those with criminal histories.
To support their opposition, Democrats frequently claim, almost as an article of faith, that illegal immigrants are less prone to commit crime. “The crime rate among immigrants is far lower than the crime rate among native-born Americans,” New York Rep. Jerrold Nadler asserted confidently. “So the whole issue is wrong.”
“Immigrants commit crimes in this country at a rate lower than natural-born citizens,” added Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy. “So, if you want a safe town or a safe neighborhood, you are better off if you have immigrants.”
Speaking on the Senate floor last year, Murphy added, “Whether you choose to want to believe the facts or not, that is not my decision, it’s your decision, but…but it is the truth.”
This tenet is incessantly parroted by the legacy news media. Sample headline, this one from ABC News: “No, migrants are not driving a surge in violent crime as Trump claims.” ABC asserted that crime in this country is declining despite an influx of illegal immigrants.
This barrage has achieved its intended goal: A McLaughlin & Associates survey commissioned by the Crime Prevention Research Center on April 29, 2025, reveals that 41.6% of voters believe illegal immigrants commit crimes at lower rates than U.S. citizens, compared to 33.3% who think otherwise.
Like most issues, U.S. public opinion on this question has a demographic and partisan component. Only men, Republicans, conservatives, whites, and those aged 41 to 55 believe illegal immigrants commit more crimes. The majority of young voters (18-29), Democrats, liberals, and African Americans most strongly assert that illegal immigrants commit fewer crimes.
But is this “the truth”? Are these “the facts”?
The data suggests that the answer is pretty clearly “no.”
These claims usually conflate legal and illegal immigrants. Legal immigrants tend to follow the law, but illegal immigrants are a different story.
As to the claim that crime is falling despite a flood of illegals, it depends on whether one looks at just crimes reported to police (the FBI data) or total crime as measured by the Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Statistics. Total crime rose markedly in 2021, 2022, and 2023 (the last year it was available). This surge coincided with a massive flood of illegals. The increases shown for total crime during the Biden-Harris administration are by far the largest percentage increases over any other three-year period, more than doubling the previous record.
One big problem is that the government databases are a mess in identifying illegal aliens. You can see this in terms of errors in the NICS background checks that are supposed to stop non-citizens with criminal records from buying guns.
There is more direct data linking illegals to crime. Just last year, the Biden administration admitted that 9% of the so-called “non-detained” illegals who were released into the U.S. had criminal backgrounds (662,566 out of 7.4 million released). The problem is that these were overwhelmingly those who had voluntarily turned themselves in at the border, presumably the ones we should be least concerned about. It doesn’t count the 2 million “gotaways” we detected crossing the border but failed to apprehend during the Biden administration, nor the unknown millions we never saw coming across the borders. All this also depends on us believing that the Biden administration didn’t undercount these criminal backgrounds. And many countries, such as Venezuela, won’t provide information on the criminal backgrounds of their citizens.
Last December, a similar estimate for New York City indicated that about 7% of the illegals living there were criminals.
A prior Maricopa County Attorney’s Office study revealed that illegal immigrants committed 21.8% of felonies sentenced in Maricopa County Superior Court, over twice their proportion of Arizona’s population. Mexican nationals alone accounted for 13% of inmates in the state prison system.
Earlier work that the Crime Prevention Research Center did for the Arizona County Prosecutor’s Association also found that illegals made up a disproportionate share of the Arizona prison population and that legal immigrants were more law-abiding than the general population. Illegal immigrants are at least 142% more likely to be convicted of a crime than other Arizonans. They also tend to commit more serious crimes and serve 10.5% longer sentences, are more likely to be classified as dangerous, and are 45% more likely to be gang members than U.S. citizens.
Critics like the Washington Post cite academic studies asserting illegal immigrants are relatively law-abiding. There are numerous problems with these studies. None of them account for changes in police, arrest, or conviction rates, or imprisonment in explaining crime rates. They look at states like California but ignore the impact on cutting crime rates from laws such as California’s 1994 three-strikes law during the period studied.
They ignore a key issue: Criminals often target those similar to themselves. Illegal immigrants, therefore, are more likely to commit crimes against other illegal immigrants. These crimes often go unreported – for fear of deportation – and as the local population of illegal immigrants grows, underreporting almost certainly increases. While these studies acknowledge that illegal immigrants who are victims hesitate to report crimes, they neglect to adjust their empirical analyses for this factor, particularly when relying on FBI Uniform Crime Reporting data. Notably, the FBI data captures only about 40% of all violent crimes and 30% of all property crimes reported in the National Crime Victimization Survey.
The media’s relentless narrative that illegal immigrants don’t commit crimes has shaped Americans’ perceptions. And these numbers, as bad as they are, likely undercount the number of criminal illegals. Even if some believe undocumented immigrants commit crimes at lower rates, ignoring ICE detainers for convicted undocumented immigrants to prevent their deportation raises doubts about whether they really care about the criminal rate of these illegal immigrants.
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2025/05/22/crime_rates_of_illegal_migrants_underreported_152825.html
UK Telegraph sold for $700 million
Ownership of The Daily Telegraph, the storied British newspaper long considered close to the country’s Conservative Party, is poised to change — again.
RedBird Capital Partners, an American investment firm, said on Friday that it reached an agreement in principle to buy control of the newspaper’s parent company, Telegraph Media Group, at a valuation of 500 million pounds, or about $675 million.
Friday’s deal marks the latest twist in a long-running takeover drama for The Telegraph, which for much of its 170-year history has been considered a house organ of sorts for Britain’s Conservative Party. (Among its nicknames is The Torygraph.)
RedBird had already bought control of the newspaper via a joint venture with International Media Investments, a fund controlled by a member of Abu Dhabi’s royal family. Under that plan, the newspaper would have been overseen by Jeff Zucker, the former president of CNN.
But that deal was blocked in 2023 after an outcry in Parliament over foreign state ownership of British media assets. Last year, the Conservative-led government passed a law barring foreign state investors from owning British newspapers.
The joint venture, known as RedBird IMI, retained control of The Telegraph while soliciting other bids.
Following the collapse of RedBird IMI’s plan, other media moguls were reportedly considering bids for the newspaper. The most ardent was Dovid Efune, the British-born owner of The New York Sun, though he had struggled to line up financing ahead of a deadline late last year.
The Spectator, an influential magazine that was part of the same holding group as The Telegraph, was sold for £100 million last year to Paul Marshall, a British hedge fund tycoon with media interests that include the right-wing TV channel GB News.
As part of Friday’s deal for The Telegraph, RedBird will buy the majority of its Emirati partner’s holdings, though IMI is expected to retain a small stake, pending a change in the foreign ownership law.
The current government, led by the Labour Party, announced last week that it would relax that restriction, allowing foreign state entities to own stakes of up to 15 percent in newspapers. It cited the importance of attracting investment in the news media. That opened the door for the revised RedBird offer, since IMI is a minority investor in its consortium.
RedBird said it was in talks to line up British investors as minority owners “with print media expertise and strong commitment to upholding the editorial values of The Telegraph.”
The 11-year-old RedBird is a well-known media investor, whose holdings include stakes in the movie studio Skydance Media; Fenway Sports Group, which owns the Boston Red Sox baseball team and the British soccer club Liverpool F.C.; and the New York Yankees’ regional sports network.
The investment firm said it planned to expand The Telegraph’s international footprint, “particularly in the United States,” as well as its digital operations.
“We believe that the U.K. is a great place to invest, and this acquisition is an important part of RedBird’s growing portfolio of media and entertainment companies in the U.K.,” Gerry Cardinale, the founder of RedBird, said in a statement.
https://archive.is/ALsU0#selection-667.0-759.239