>>2309083

Clock's never been there to make predictions!

It's "Future proves past" – not past proves future.

…. but your clock makes some sense, except – for above reason – I would remove/change the "What happens July 27th/28th" to maybe what's on the clock for July 27th, or such … At least change the "what happens" to "what may happen".

>>2309352

>>2309355

For starters, here's a run using stegdetect, with "negative" results removed.

Stegdetect runs on JPEG – so PNG images (file signature: 0x89 0x50) have not been tested.

pastebin.com/JvhFPmPR

>>2309422

I know, had been mentioned yesterday night already in #2901 & #2902

>>2303180 (pb)

>>2303045 (pb)

and related answers …

>>2309423

Power of stegdetect (here locally) is I can run it scripted … won't use no webpage for whatever 100s of images … sorry.

There's better tools for that.