Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 9:46 a.m. No.23091863   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1878

THINK WE ARE GETTING READY FOR THE COVID REVEAL

Djt: Quid pro Quo

โ€”

1 post(s) found containing "quid pro ".

3611

Nov 20, 2019 9:03:25 PM EST

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 7358656

THE CLINTON FOUNDATION

[QUID PROQUO - internal alarm [how to frame/defend]]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52561

Read carefully.

[Note: Podesta emails non_public [internal]]

Fact: Ukraine is the single largest CF donor

Coincidence?

Q

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 9:50 a.m. No.23091878   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23091863

Q read very carefully - #Q3611

>https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/52561

-โ€“

Re: Follow up the HRC idea re; foundation

From:jbenenson@bsgco.com

To: gruncom@aol.com

CC: re47@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com, Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com, bfallon@hillaryclinton.com, kschake@hillaryclinton.com

Date: 2015-04-30 01:37

Subject: Re: Follow up the HRC idea re; foundation

Agree with Jen.

Also tend to agree with her going before him. Anything other than her taking quid pro quo of the table, included what would say first, won't take questions about her actions off the table.

Joel Benenson

Benenson Strategy Group

On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:15 PM, Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com<mailto:gruncom@aol.com>wrote:

Why do you think she needs to do this before WJC?

Mandy Grunwald

Grunwald Communications

202 973-9400

On Apr 29, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:re47@hillaryclinton.com>wrote:

Ditto with John. Would need to be prepared for moreโ€ฆbut would be fantastic to limit to one.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:11 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com<mailto:john.podesta@gmail.com>wrote:

Fine with the proposed way of handling what she says, but hard setting to take only one question.

On Apr 29, 2015 8:02 PM, "Jennifer Palmieri" <jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com<mailto:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>wrote:

First, thanks to all for the marathon session today, I thought we got

a lot of good work done.

Second, I wanted to follow up on HRC idea of doing the video. Having

thought about it and talked to Craig and Maura about it - I don't

think it is good idea for her to do. There aren't great answers and

in many cases not her place to answer them.

But I think it does make sense for her to publicly state that she

never did anything at state to help a donor. Philippe has been a

proponent of this. She could frame it this way:

1) very proud of Clinton foundation work.

2) think people donate to it bc they want to support good works.

3) if anyone did ever give money in hopes of influencing something

State did - they are foolish bc she never did that and never would.

SOS makes life and death decisions and those kinds of political

considerations don't come into play.

At least this way she will have taken off the table any notion that

there was a quid pro quo - even if some donors may have had bad

intentions.

If we did this, think we should do before WJC interview airs on

Monday. Which may mean that tomorrow is the last chance we have will

she will be in front of the press (they wont be at fundraisers but

will prob be outside them so she could take a q).

What do others think?

Sent from my iPhone

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 10:38 a.m. No.23092069   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23092017

j.d: operation chokepoint 2.0 is dead and it is not coming back.

j.d: we reject regulators and we fired gary gensler and we are going to fire everyone like him.

j.d: we are in the process getting the genius act through congress to the presidents desk.

j.d: once it is enacted it will enable stable coins to be used by millions in this country.

dollar pegged stable coins will help the american dollar.

j

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 10:42 a.m. No.23092077   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23092017

j.d: we want the american people to know that crypto, digital assets and bitcoin is here to stay.

we want to make sure that this 3 trillion dollar economy stay in america, and president trump is going to fight to make sure it stays in the usa and not somewhere else to friendlier .

i still own a fair amount of bitcoin today.

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 10:48 a.m. No.23092095   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23092017

jd: i have 3 bits of advice for this community

1) get involved in politics or politics will get involved with you.

2) The PRC is leaning away from bitcoin, that means the USA should lean into it.

3) What happens to bitcoin will effect A.I .

So stay involved in the A.I conversation.

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 11:03 a.m. No.23092132   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2205

>>23092127

yeah just what you need moar of

predatory foreign females

untill you get rid of the divorce courts and the feminst, all you will get is succubus hordes of blood sucking females who will bleed you dry and laugh and swear at you in a foreign language.

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 11:24 a.m. No.23092221   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2232

>>23092205

its not what they say.

it is what they do

words are cheap.

women can keep up the pretence for years until they get what they want.

premediated and calculated.

but go ahead.

spin that dice.

its a tough choice until you put that ring on that finger.

Anonymous ID: 85666c May 28, 2025, 11:35 a.m. No.23092270   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23092232

anon is not saying avoid women.

you have to go through the mgtow red pill and all 5 stages of grief.

they will shit test you

but you can shit test them.

when you find one you can afford.

piss her off by being late, saying something inapproiate and see how she acts.

if she fucks you off.

it was just your turn.

if she attacks you

run.

if she goes silent,

wait for her to make the next move.

if she controls you with tears, you are being played, especially if she wants to make up with sex.

the game is rigged. you are the prize and will be the atm and punching bag for the worlds problems that she finds.

plus that mobile phone and the internet full of simps who are always available for validation .