Anonymous ID: 1a57ad July 27, 2018, 7:26 a.m. No.2309770   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9815 >>9860

>>2309447

 

Weird.

 

Looking at https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d879e4fd98e8922c194bd9a50f6ea4e5fa6da7a68331269372ba76714aa61b12.jpg

 

Extracted all PK tails, couldn't find a valid zip.

 

But. File sha256 is c57c14cd577de9cc60a68dafc52a15c5432fcd218ef73f1f1d18f570993c3967.

 

It should be d879e4fd98e8922c194bd9a50f6ea4e5fa6da7a68331269372ba76714aa61b12.

 

Something's fucky!?

Anonymous ID: 1a57ad July 27, 2018, 7:54 a.m. No.2309965   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0028

>>2309860

 

Thank you anon!

 

I assume images are resized by a background worker. So stegano is automatically erased after a while. Interesting feature.

 

Python script to extract tails starting with PK https://pastebin.com/Sbs1Ny0c

 

My zip tools don't find anything valid. Will try later on a windows machine.

Anonymous ID: 1a57ad July 27, 2018, 8:08 a.m. No.2310072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0124

>>2310028

 

Yes the anonfiles image has the correct hash, it is the original.

 

What I meant is that the image at this URL has change, its quality has been reduced (dimensions are the same, number of bytes is about half):

 

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d879e4fd98e8922c194bd9a50f6ea4e5fa6da7a68331269372ba76714aa61b12.jpg