If that is you, then there was a question for you yesterday, after you posted the pastebin with the image links:
Lol. My apologies, but that's a BS explanation! If you do not why, then stop calling yourself "steganon"!
sha256 hashes are computed as the image is posted
So when I download an image, and it doesn't end up to have the exact same hash, then that means that the image has been modified after it was posted, or in other words, that it is different from the original one posted.
That modification can be of any type – but it has nothing to do with potential steganographic content …
Stop sighing, and come up with more plausible explanations, and stop pretending you're the only one "in the know".
for →2309524
For those trying to do stego on the images:
So called "steganon" [4c712f] obviously is a faggot shill with 13 posts when the bread doesn't even have 160, using standard phrases to blend in – blender, lol!
He's "willing to help us now" … bahahaha
Go away little boy!
Here are two (not the best/only tools probably but work on PNG) examples, just from a quick search
github.com/zed-0xff/zsteg
github.com/b3dk7/StegExpose (uses java – I don't like that too much)
For JPEG you can try and use stegdetect, like posted in last bread.
Uploaded my version of the image, which has the correct sha256sum.
anonfiles.com/Ibw76af0b9/Inkedq_LI.jpg
But after download, double-check the hash – don't know if anonfiles changes anything …
Got it, thanks for clarifying.
Later, once we find anything, maybe it'd be useful to ask all anons to check their image archives for correct hashes and gather all images that are original (by hash) …
I only have roughly 130 or so images (out of more than 400) with accurate hashes (as originally posted).