>>23095587 (pb)
Let's deconstruct your logic, psyoperator.
You claim to be able to know 'lawless cops' and that you can use force against them.
And thus it's OK, in that case, under your flawed argument, due to 'equal protection under the law' to use force on anyone who is lawless (Police are people, so what you do to them applies to other people too).
And thus, if anyone sees you and perceives that YOU are lawless they can thus use force against you?
You exclude due process. You exclude the assumption that people are innocent until proven guilty.
Thus anyone can be forceful against you when they perceive you as 'lawless', as you promote 'force' against the 'lawless'.
Did I show you the flaw in your argument? If you ask me, to promote your kind of anarchy is the essence of lawlessness.