Republican congressman booed at Iowa town hall, admits he didn’t read Big Beautiful Bill

A Republican congressman faced a hostile crowd at a town hall in Iowa after admitting he did not read the Big Beautiful Bill before voting to pass it. The audience erupted in boos when Rep. Ashley Hinson defended her support for the legislation, which has sparked controversy over its tax provisions and spending cuts. This moment underscores growing frustration among voters who feel lawmakers are rubber-stamping bills without fully understanding their impact.

Hinson attempted to justify her vote, claiming the bill would secure the border and provide tax relief for working Americans. The crowd was not convinced. Attendees shouted objections, with some accusing her of blindly following party leadership. The backlash reflects deep skepticism over the bill’s contents, particularly its effects on Medicaid and food assistance programs.

The congressman admitted there were provisions in the bill that he did not fully support. He was pressed on language that could make it harder for judges to hold officials in contempt of court, a measure critics argue could shield Trump administration figures from legal consequences. This revelation only fueled the anger in the room, as voters demanded accountability from their representatives.

The town hall grew more heated when constituents questioned the bill’s impact on healthcare. A disabled attendee asked whether they would lose coverage under the new Medicaid rules. Hinson assured the crowd that medically frail individuals would be exempt, but skepticism remained. The exchange highlighted concerns that the bill’s work requirements could push vulnerable Americans off essential programs.

The event ended with chants and jeers, signaling widespread dissatisfaction with the congressman’s handling of the issue. The bill, passed by the House, now moves to the Senate, where further changes could be made. This town hall was a clear warning—voters are watching, and they expect their representatives to do their homework before casting votes.

https://www.newsweek.com/iowa-republican-town-hall-ashley-hinson-2078313

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/gop-rep-ashley-hinson-crowd-boos-iowa-town-hall-trump-rcna209577

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/crowds-boo-house-republicans-town-halls-trumps-big/story

Health Secretary Says Government Plans To Launch New Medical Journals

‘We’re probably going to stop publishing in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and … other journals because they’re all corrupt,’ Kennedy said.

“What we’re going to do is we’re going to devote probably 20 percent of NIH’s budget to replication; every study has to be replicated,” Kennedy said.

“We’re going to publish the peer review for the first time. We’re probably going to stop publishing in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and those other journals because they’re all corrupt.”

“Unless these journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing there, and we’re going to create our own journals in-house in each of the institutions,” he added later. “And they’re going to become the preeminent journals.”

A spokesperson for the New England Journal of Medicine told The Epoch Times in an email that the journal has “an impeccable record of scientific rigor and independence.”

“We use rigorous peer review and editorial processes to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the research we publish, whether the work comes from academic or industry authors,” the spokesperson said.

“NEJM will continue to focus on publishing scientific breakthroughs to improve the health of Americans and people around the world.”

The Lancet and JAMA did not return requests for comment by publication time.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/health-secretary-says-government-plans-launch-new-medical-journals

>>23097755

And know one will care as you showed the world what you deem ok

Israeli Foreign Minister Says Arms Embargoes Will Lead To 'Second Holocaust' & End Of Israel

Israel’s foreign minister has said that an arms embargo on his country would lead to the elimination of the Israeli state and "a second Holocaust".

Gideon Saar was speaking on Tuesday at an international conference on antisemitism in Jerusalem. "If, God forbid, the calls and actions of countries and politicians for an arms embargo on Israel succeed, the result will be the destruction of Israel and a second Holocaust," he said.

The comments came as Spain this week called on European countries to suspend arms shipments amid Israel’s ongoing siege on Gaza.

At a meeting of the “Madrid Group”, Spain’s foreign minister called for an immediate suspension of Europe’s cooperation deal with Israel and an embargo on arms shipments.

Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Morocco and Brazil were among those present at the meeting.

"What is the meaning of actions or statements - by politicians or countries - to impose an arms embargo on Israel?" said Saar, in response. "If such moves succeed, Israel will simply be destroyed. There will be another Holocaust - on the soil of the land of Israel."

"This is essentially a way to deprive the Jewish people of the means to defend themselves. Means that they so lacked during the long years of exile and during the Holocaust."

The largest suppliers of weapons to Israel are the United States, Germany and Italy. Several nations, including France, Spain and the UK, have either paused the supply of some weapons, or have suspended export licenses.

A report earlier this month found that the UK continued to send a wide range of arms to Israel even after the government suspended 30 arms export licenses in September.

The UK, France and Canada have threatened Israel with sanctions if it fails to stop its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid to enter.

"We will not stand by while the Netanyahu government pursues these egregious actions," the countries said jointly on 20 May. "If Israel does not cease the renewed military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete actions in response."

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/israeli-foreign-minister-says-arms-embargoes-will-lead-second-holocaust-end-israel

Peak Escalation

The dark motives behind global escalation

Essentially, the Peak Escalation hypothesis assumes that there are strong background forces seeking to widen regional conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and, possibly, Asia Minor into a combined ‘global conflict,’ essentially a World War III. This might sound preposterous, but when you apply Occam’s Razor to everything that has been happening (especially in and around Ukraine) rigorously, like I did in the Horsemen of the Apocalypse, it yields a rather definite answer. That is, the answer that requires the least amount of assumptions is that there is some powerful force pushing for the global escalation. It does not matter if you believe this or not. If you apply the Occam’s Razor principle in a truthful and honest manner, you will simply end up at this conclusion.

The motives behind such a force are much more difficult to come by. The military-industrial complex naturally seeks profits, and the Deep State seeks control. However, we have to ask, would a nuclear war serve their aims, as this is an inevitable end-result of waging a war against Russia? We can state, with rather high confidence, that annihilation of a vast part of the human race would not serve the aims of military corporations, which would lose their source of income (and factories), or those seeking for wider government control of societies, because societies and government control systems would collapse. So, to find a deeper motive behind the escalation against Russia, we need to step beyond the standard logic and common sense.

In the Horsemen of the Apocalypse, I speculated that there exists some ‘group-over-groups’ seeking to Divide et Impera (to Divide and Conquer). I, for once, quoted former U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, who stated that

Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.

After the Occam’s Razor yielded the outcome of such a background force existing (I even checked with a student of philosophy whether I had applied it correctly), I extended my analysis to their aims. This is what it yielded:

If one applies Occam’s razor to everything described above, it yields one clear answer. There must be a very powerful group above parliaments, national elites and supranational organizations, like the World Economic Forum and the Bilberberg Group, pushing its own agenda of Divide et Impera. Moreover, the agenda must be exceptionally brutal, as it seems to attack all levels of human existence (physical, mental, emotional, spiritual). The existence of such a group would fit in with what President Wilson described in the early 20th century.

https://mtmalinen.substack.com/p/peak-escalation

>>23097777

>>23097808

Written 1952

>>23097862

You mean the central bankers dollar

>>23097882

If the people need a hero we shall give them one