>>23097307 LB
No it does not, it gives them permission just like any other guest to enter like a guest. Just because you allow someone into your living room does not mean you've given permission to go throughout the home. If they felt threatened, they should have left.
The conversation can be held inside, while I'm armed, or they can leave. That's their choices. I have a RIGHT to be armed. If they don't like it, too bad.
Right?
To think allowing a cop to step through the front door gives them permission to go throughout the home "for officer safety" is insane and an obvious intent to get around our rights.
But, but officer safety! Officer safety I tell you, officer safety!!!
I guess we should change it to the land of the permit and the home of officer safety.
kek
They don't care about the law, they think anything that comes out of their mouth is a lawful order.
>If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same!
Remember when an anon asked Q if there was a plan in place for after POTUS? Hmmm.
>>23097414
Hi hopper
>has no hopes of ever having a serious relationship with women in a normal way
You sure do love to project. I've been happily married for ~25 years, how about yourself?
They really don't care about the law, only that you obey their will.
Cry moar.
>Why are Kash Patel and Dan Bongino Giving Cagey Answers on Epstein and January 6
Cause they were both ops.
> they will seek to change the times
“When evening comes, you say, ‘It will be fair weather, for the sky is red,’ and in the morning, ‘Today it will be stormy, for the sky is red and overcast.’ You know how to interpret the appearance of the sky, but you cannot interpret the signs of the times"