>the jew takes a bath once a decade
i object…
and i am offended
how dare you besmirch the noble and fastidious rat by comparing him to the lowest life form infesting the solar system?
>The choice to know will be ours…
and pray tell me…
operationally…
how could that be made to happen?
serious question…
maybe unverified reports from a "discredited" source?
how ELSE could it be done?
let's hear YOUR "sensible" workable mechanism
>Definition of Plaigerism?
no idea
on the other hand plagiarism is falsely claiming or implying authorship of large word-for-word passages of composition without proper attribution to the true author
trip ducks confirm
the moving finger has writ
not all thy piety nor wit shall lure it back to cancel half a line
>Que Sera, Sera? Or just continue on your Merry Way of Full Throttle JackAssery? Try dat.
yeah….
way to completely sidestep any sort of answer to a serious question while simultaneously lobbing ad hominem grenades
>a few massive egos + gay pedo 5 eyes billionaires on ecstacy
so yer saying there MIGHT BE such a thing as too much freedom?
glad to hear someone else advocate for sharia law
>Canuck Journo detected…
your "detector" is less accurate than a broken clock
>your question is shallow and bereft of true understanding…
YOU are the asshole defending Q quotes
asking how it would be possible to implement one oft quotes passage is not shallow
as for "true understanding," by all means, pls enlighten the rest of us, oh mighty highest ranking anon
making what you think are eclectic references in order to assert you sophistication is a fools errand when the references are schlock
and the entire exercise, even ignoring the epic fail, is just another attempt to misdirect and AVOID ANSWERING THE QUESTION
you are in possession of the absolute documentable proof
HOW do you go about giving each and every person THE CHOICE TO KNOW (or NOT know)?
c'mon brainiac…
if all that shit you rattled off is so potent
you should have no problem proposing JUST ONE method for GIVING EVERY PERSON THE CHOICE TO KNOW (or NOT know)
WE'RE WAITING…..
>Decide.
decide WHAT?
decide whether or not to believe RRN?
DECIDE WHAT???
how does everyone ACCESS your "truth" so that they can "decide?"
how does everyone "decide" if they want to ACCESS your "truth" unless everyone knows where to find it?
how do you do that, in SPECIFIC, PRACTICAL terms
>also be good
sounds like you wish to impose "community standards"
is your name karen and are you president of a HOA?
who gets to decide what constitutes being "good" and what constitutes being "bad?"
aksing for a fren….
pride parades are constitutionally protected free speech
gay marriage and child adoption are constitutionally protected private concerns
you wave your hand and say "do good"
but you do NOT explain who gets to decide what is or isn't "good"
>You are too stupid for the age of reason.
or maybe you're too insecure and triggered when anyone forces you to examine your favorite dogma logically
so you HAVE no answer or explanation of precisely what "the choice to know will be yours" means, or how it's possible to implement it
GOT IT
thx for playing
(PRO TIP: get some references that aren't trite sophomoric generalizations or newage fluff)
i read a book a day
i'm in my eighth decade
can you do 3rd grade multiplication?
textbooks take a little longer
i've only read a few thousand of those
on the other hand, i've also written a few (textbooks, that is…)
how 'bout (((YOU)))?
ah…
so you advocate for a theocracy
gov't by religious edict
and i suppose YOU get to pick the religion?
that would necessarily entail different countries for each religion
btw, i'm not disagreeing with you
i'm just checking to see if YOU KNOW exactly what your position is
so you want the same kind of totalitarian society as the "woke" libtards
you just have a different set of standards you want to force upon everyone
'cause that's what I'M hearing from you…
>nudity and indecent exposure, especially around children is not.
actually it is…
unless you can show me the "decency clause" in the first amendment
>Already told ya Babu. Decide.
we all heard your lame-ass cop out the first time
no need to repeat yourself
i'm not the one advocating anything
i'm only trying to get you to examine YOUR bullshit a little more critically
YOU are the one who wants everyone to conform to YOUR standards
>Didn't realize parades are mentioned in the constitution…
well that just means you're dumber than dirt
free speech is mentioned, asshat
"free" means everyone is free to say whatever they please, and that also includes the right to peaceably assemble
>You want to give the gays 2 months is what im hearing.
clean your ears, ya triggered fuckwit
i ASKED "who decides" what is "good" behavior
where does the constitution say that?
the constitution is a list of things THE GOV'T cannot do
it contains ZERO prohibitions on what people can do
>Hosea is listed as the first of the twelve minor prophets in the Hebrew Bible.
Jose can you see???
we all jews now???
>Arguably,
exactly
it's ARGUABLE
it's NOT decreed by the constitution
maybe you should stop using the constitution as your ultimate authority if you don't actually know what it does and does NOT say
>DOESNT MEAN YOU SHOULD
SO WHO GETS TO DECIDE??
simple enough question
simpler than "what is a female"
why you havin' so much trouble?
>holds that certain truths are self-evident
SPECIFICALLY, the God given right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
married faggots can claim adoption as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
i'm NOT arguing FOR any of those things
i'm only trying to get YOU to explain the basis of your BELIEFS as a way to get you to EXAMINE them more critically