Anonymous ID: 0d8f6a May 30, 2025, 11:50 a.m. No.23100159   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Was this written by AI?

 

Note the inconsistent use of gender. Rep Ashley Hinson is referred to as both male and female.

 

The first two links provided by anon do not contain the text quoted by anon. The abcnews link doesn't work.

 

(PB) >>23097742

>A Republican congressman faced a hostile crowd at a town hall in Iowa after admitting he did not read the Big Beautiful Bill before voting to pass it. The audience erupted in boos when Rep. Ashley Hinson defended her support for the legislation, which has sparked controversy over its tax provisions and spending cuts. This moment underscores growing frustration among voters who feel lawmakers are rubber-stamping bills without fully understanding their impact.

 

>Hinson attempted to justify her vote, claiming the bill would secure the border and provide tax relief for working Americans. The crowd was not convinced. Attendees shouted objections, with some accusing her of blindly following party leadership. The backlash reflects deep skepticism over the bill’s contents, particularly its effects on Medicaid and food assistance programs.

 

>The congressman admitted there were provisions in the bill that he did not fully support. He was pressed on language that could make it harder for judges to hold officials in contempt of court, a measure critics argue could shield Trump administration figures from legal consequences. This revelation only fueled the anger in the room, as voters demanded accountability from their representatives.

Anonymous ID: 0d8f6a May 30, 2025, 12:18 p.m. No.23100266   🗄️.is 🔗kun

(PB) >>23099224 The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary legal status granted to more than 500,000 immigrants by the Biden administration.

 

Only KBJ and SS dissented. Which means ACB and JR both voted to stay the order and allow the status to be revoked. Where are all the anons that jump up and down every time one of those two rule in a way they don't like? To show they are fair shouldn't they at least acknowledge the vote in this case?

 

JR and ACB may in fact be comped but calling them traitors because they disagree with you says more about you than it does about them.

 

In a similar vein I have noticed recently that Trump holds his fire re: Rand Paul (who I have doubts about), Massie, as well as Barrett and Roberts, and a few others. Maybe because he recognizes they are basing their statements on principle, even if those principles differ from his own? Certainly a practice to be seriously considered.

 

Okay, I got it off my chest now. You can go back to your regular pissposting.