Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 6:02 p.m. No.23105634   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23105614

Not really. It's just he has repetitive patterns that he announces himself with, something that was supposed to be verboten for the anons he imitates but it's okay for him and his shill buddies. If he wants to try imitating everything everything I meme and turn it into a perverted, over-the-top caricature out of spite and envy, I'm okay with that. I'm also okay with calling him out on his never-ending Absolute Retard deep state bullshit. I wouldn't say it's stalking, per se, more like overwatch. It's getting boring slapping the little cringe as of late though, he's too chicken shit to engage, just prances around all zoned out with delusions of attention.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 6:11 p.m. No.23105656   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5661

>>23105639

It's the only thing you do now since the MuhJoo narrative got a global and then started getting mocked and you got all pissed about that and decided your goal in life was to steal all of SP's thunder, and to do that, it seems the only thing you could think of was toโ€ฆ imitate his meme rotations, his filenames, his turns of phrases, everything you can, so then you can run around saying I'm a legend, and that you're me, and put trademark symbols on the nickname some goofball Absolute Retard gave me because of a filename I gave my favorite frog that you're just so fascinated with that you want to trademark, but you can't steal a meme, retard. Went from being able to debate to trying to turn it into an ego pissing contest, and the only way you can compete is by imitating me because I guess there's nothing behind the costume, huh?

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 6:31 p.m. No.23105743   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23105675

>Try to hab some compassion and forgibbness for the famefag shills

You deserve neither, failfag. You were almost a famefag. Wanted control of SP's reputation more than anything and it's been your primary goal for two years, whoever the dipshit is at a keyboard somewhere overseeing all the bullshit on your ID.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 6:37 p.m. No.23105768   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

The fraudulent piety after trying to steal someone's reputation for two years, and justify it with rules from another platform that he himself doesn't follow, is most delicious. Or cherry-pick some line from a Q drop to turn into a rule to hold over someone's head, trying to gatekeep the definition of anonymity based upon what Q wrote, doesn't hold any water when the toothpaste is already out of the tube. I never named myself, you Absolute Retard losers did. I just never shied away from the name, and now you chucklefuck clowns put trademark symbols on your impersonation. Is that supposed to mean something to me, by the way? The trademark symbol shit just makes what you're trying to do look more evil, by the way, and is contradictory to what you used to say.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 6:44 p.m. No.23105805   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5823

KEK. Nothing but deception and lies trying to hold back the truth. Old guard retards running through all their tricks and nothing is working like it used to. That must be the part that hurts them the worst, that they're not invincible. Compare the Absolute Retard shills display of intellect and rational interaction in 2022, to the delusional figments for attention and schizophrenic spam they post now. Really has been quite the ride. I feel privileged and honored to be still able to post here, they act like they're entitled to.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:05 p.m. No.23106119   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6130

>>23106106

No, are you incapable of comprehending that someone other than him might respond? Okay, here's how this works. I disagreed with you, so then you use that disagreement as proof of your bullshit and accuse me of being the shill. Ready? Go! That is unless you want to improvise the underlying divide and conquer pattern you guys have used for years here.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:13 p.m. No.23106144   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23106130

Who fucking cares about his post count? I don't give a fuck, so why are you continually whining about how many posts one anon has. Do you see Pig IP hopping? I don't, nor do I see him posting mentally ill bullshit all day like VaticanClown. I see Pig memeing about America, the country winning, and making fun of the deep state derps that post here. Why would you have a problem with patriotic memeing and someone that's not scarethat think they're hot shit until they come here?d to mouth off retarded clowns? He doesn't IP hop, filter and move on, don't spend multiple posts whining with reddit spacing about it.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:14 p.m. No.23106150   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>someone that's not scarethat think they're hot shit until they come here?d to mouth off retarded clowns?

Okay, I don't know what happened there, but I think I can salvage it. Ahemโ€ฆ

 

someone that's not scared to mouth off retarded clowns that think they're hot shit until they come here

 

Not sure how that happened. KEK!

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:17 p.m. No.23106163   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23106154

You proved yourself nothing but a clown trying to create consensus against personality you can't destroy. You failed, again. You're an expert on failure now by this point. You should write a book about it. With a pen.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:40 p.m. No.23106228   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6235

KEK. Now they're trying to push the veracity of satire that fits no dictionary definition of satire on a site claiming to have inside intel, and because publicly available names are used in "satire" articles, that's why it's not faced legal action. Are they serious?

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:42 p.m. No.23106234   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

If it had real insider information and wasn't a clown site giving out insider information on the downfall of the deep state it would have been shut down pretty damn fast under the Biden administration. See, I can post contradictory argument too.

Anonymous ID: 71953b May 31, 2025, 8:48 p.m. No.23106250   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6259 >>6271

>>23106235

The onus of proof is not on the person that disbelieves the lie. You haven't presented anything convincing. And in fact are trying to doubtfag your way to consensus about that garbage site that's only pushed here, and by people that claim because it's not accepted here that means it's the truth.