Woman flips off cop, so he pulls her over and ARRESTS HER FOR FAILURE TO SIGNAL. Have you ever heard of "failure to signal" being an arrestable offense?
So, can anyone tell me why this domestic terrorist shouldn't be in prison or worse? Do our rights and constitution actually mean something or not?
>Orthodox are pretty much the same as the Catholic
A bunch of liars scared to step into the light.
They HATE our right to record OUR SERVANTS and OUR PROPERTY
The orthodox and catholic churches ARE dark governments.
Su much nonsense. They hate the idea of the people recording and they don't control it. They hate shining a light on government, hence why cops get so angry at auditors recording.
You're not wrong, but LE in this country has ALWAYS been lawless.
No, they want stupid order followers that are too stupid to understand that things like this video are blatantly unconstitutional and will go along with abusing or killing innocent people because someone higher in the chain of command, the chains they chose to bind themselves with, said it's ok.
YOU want to try to project nonsense.
>cause as much chaos
When one wants people to accept order, YOUR IDEA OF ORDER, could one cause so much chaos they beg one to rule over them?
Male and female are still One What some call good others call evil, and what some call evil others call good.
Do some force their will on others denying them freedom of will though?
It's terrorism and it's wrong for any government.
>>23109043
All three branches have violated the constitution. Even Trump has. They said it must be done legally but our government has been operating outside the constitution for a LONG TIME, and presidential immunity is unconstitutional no matter what the lawless court says.
>Epstein an he evaded justice?
>Then he would need to have a meeting with God arranged.
>In which case, the official story would have to be that he killed himself.
What you just described would be unconstitutional.
Boeing stopped the minute USAID was shut down, which I found interesting.
So your response to lawlessness is more lawlessness?
You sound like an enemy to the constitution, trying to justify violation of it.
No, you argued that the deep state violates the constitution, so it's ok to violate it in return.
I see it as two "sides" that are BOTH violating our constitution while fighting each other, and We the People are in the middle.
>Let's take Epstein, for example:
>What if there was a risk a corrupt judge would destroy the case against
>Epstein and he evaded justice?
>Then he would need to have a meeting with God arranged.
>In which case, the official story would have to be that he killed himself.
>You can't tell the public, we topped him, just to be sure.
That would be unconstitutional.. Also, where they give their right to public trial?
*given
Everyone has rights, and government has no authority to deny them rights because government claims they're terrorists
The accused has a right to a public trial. There's a reason government wants to keep it hidden from the people.
I know the law. You should pay attention to the ACTUAL constitution and law, not what they tell you it says or means. The constitution limits government, they don't get to decide to ignore it.
The accused has the right to a public trial, government likes to keep things secret from the people, but government answers to We the People. They're not our masters, they're our servants and they need a serious reminding of that. They put the "institution" above people.
>She exposes the school boards are making teachers pass students just to keep their graduation numbers up
Cause it's all about funding, not educating the kids.
>The people voted to clean up deep state.
You really need to learn about the constitution. We are a constitutional representative republic, our constitution protects the minority from the majority. The constitution limits government, and one of those limits is EVERYONE accused has the right to face their accuser and a public trial. Government will always try to justify "secret" proceedings for "public safety"
You claim that because I point out government is violating it. You WANT to believe I'm wrong, so you choose to believe I'm wrong. The fact is, government is bound by our constitution but are violating it and you support that.
Our constitution grants all persons due process, our government is depriving people, not just aliens, of due process, while you look the other way. That's what I'm saying. Government has been violating our constitution for a LONG time.
>I see you won't touch my victims statement
You mean where you ignore constitutionally protected rights and try an appeal to emotion to justify violating the constitution.
So if government accuses you of murder and you allegedly didn't give your victim due process, then government can ignore the constitutional limits placed on it and deprive your due process?
You should want all the videos of cops breaking the law on youtube, there's new ones every day.
Typical enemy to the constitution, always some justification in your mind for why you know better. So if someone is denied due process and executed in secret, it's all good? Fuck the constitution?
The mistake is made when evil claims to be good and people believe it. You try to look like a lamb but speak like a dragon.
Oops, *watch
The many many videos of cops blatantly violating the law and people complaining about LE's actions being ignored are witness to their lawlessness.
Special access? No. They need complete transparency and to remember they are servants to We the People, they're not above We the People.
The sword of Truth is a sharp double edged sword.
"Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. The second is like it, love your neighbor as yourself. All the law and the prophets hang on these commandments.
Do you want due process if you're accused of a crime? Do you want your rights upheld and respected? Or do you want government to rule over you and deny your rights because THEY say it needs be kept secret?
Everyone on this planet is my neighbor. He didn't say the neighbors you like did He? If you love only those who love you what credit is it to you? Treat others how you want to be treated.
So, if you're accused of murder, do you want government to deny you your rights because they say you murdered someone?
I'm guessing you would have enjoyed witch-hunts, some will believe people are guilty simply if it's repeated enough.
Can you cite that?
>He that shewed mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him, Go, and do thou likewise
Thank you. Is it showing mercy to deny someone else the same rights you give yourself?
Did Jesus not say, if you love only those who love you, what credit is it to you? The others are neighbors too, just not acting like good neighbors. I am a good neighbor, so I believe in giving all due process.
He had the same rights I do, if I do not stand for his right I do not stand for mine.
"I disagree with what you say but will fight to the death your right to say it"
Like it or not, even epstein had/has the RIGHT to due process and a public trial.
Notice that you project to support your nonsense? Epstein had/has the right to due process and a public trial.
You're literally trying the same appeal to emotion you already tried. AGAIN, if government accuses you of murder and says you didn't give your alleged victim due process (or rights) then you have no problem with them denying you due process (your rights)?
You've lost the argument and can't make a valid point so you project and then try the same point again.
Why does government do alot of the unlawful evil things it does? CONTROL.
Perhaps you're witness to a politician murdering someone. So if they accuse you of murder, plant evident, you shouldn't get your due process and PUBLIC day in court with a jury?
You're desperately trying to use appeal to emotion to justify violation of the constitution.
*evidence
Like for being an enemy to the constitution? Like for deprivation of rights under color of law? Like for mindlessly repeating accusations as fact without evidence?