RedWave Press
@RedWave_Press
CNN reports BRUTAL poll numbers for Democrats, with just 16% of Americans believing the DNC has strong leaders and only 19% thinking the DNC gets things done.
9:58 AM · Jun 1, 2025
·
80.7K
Views
https://x.com/RedWave_Press/status/1929175767398699021
Their numbers have dropped 1% and 2% since last month. ==Dems, please keep on pushing woke and perverse ideologies, it’s working for you!=
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
NEW: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent strikes down CBS News’ Margaret Brennan by reminding her about her own previous comments about inflation.
Another rough weekend for Margaret.
Brennan: “The reality is there will either be less inventory or things at higher prices or both.”
Bessent:“When we were here in March, you said there was going to be big inflation. There hasn't been any inflation. Actually, the inflation numbers are the best in four years. So why don't we stop trying to say this could happen and wait and see what does happen.”
June 1, 2025
(https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1929191722531291428
Margaret is their assigned attack dog, but she’s always wrongBessent has a huge mind and brilliant memory. She U.S. outmatched 20 to 1.
1:01
CNN only keeps their viewers is for these analyses. Thats why they keep on revealing the party that CNN fully supports with fake news, that the Dems, are losing in every demographic. If they didn’t have these reports with Enten and others, their viewership would drop like a rock. They’ve lost close to 50% of their viewers this year after constantly lying Kamala would win.
I wondered why they didn’t fire Enten because he proved over and over Trump was winning, but their shows said he was awful and losing,now we know why, it’s the only segment that increases viewership.
This is their best segment! KEK
Gunther Eagleman™
@GuntherEagleman
Russ Vought is DEMOLISHING Dana Bash.
Every second of this is a master class.
Vought does not come to play around.
5:52
June 1, 2025
https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1929170273703493966
Full article and transcript of video
Russ Vought Wrecks CNN’s Dana Bash in Budget Showdown — Says Trump Has Constitutional Tools to SLASH Federal Workforce Without Congress
by Jim Hᴏft Jun. 2, 2025 8:45 am1/2
Appearing on State of the Union Sunday morning, President Trump’s former OMB Director and top budget strategist Russ Vought demolished the corporate media spin that only Congress can green-light Trump’s game-changing federal workforce cuts.
Vought dropped a constitutional truth bomb: Trump doesn’t need Congress to gut the bloated, woke federal bureaucracy—he already has the executive tools to do it.
Dana Bash clumsily invoked the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, attempting to trap Vought with the tired claim that Congress alone controls the purse strings.But Vought, unfazed, counterpunched with constitutional clarity and historical context.
When Bash tried to smear Vought as cruel for wanting to “traumatize” federal workers, Vought turned the tables—exposing the rot at the heart of the bureaucracy.
Transcript:
Dana Bash: Let’s talk about the budget. That was the budget to come, but I want to talk about what has been going on with DOGE and what Elon Musk has already done. He says it was $175 billion in cuts, and these are cuts to funding and programs that Congress already passed—already signed into law, the law of the land—before you took office. You say that you’re going to submit about $9 billion in cuts this week for Congress to approve, to make those cuts that you’ve already done official, largely in foreign aid and public broadcasting. But you’re hearing from members of Congress on both sides of the aisle that they want you to submit approval for all of the cuts that you’ve done through DOGE. Will you?
Russ Vought: We might. We want to see how this first bill does. We want to make sure it’s actually passed. It’s the first of many rescissions bills. We may not actually have to get Congress to pass the rescissions bills. Why? Some we have executive tools. We have impoundment—that for 200 years, presidents had the ability and the recognition that they had the ability—to spend less than the ceiling. If you have $100 million that Congress says, “We want you to go and use for a particular use,” and you can do it for less, for 200 years that was totally appropriate. Since the 1970s, that has changed and has led to massive waste, fraud, and abuse.
Secondly, the very Impoundment Control Act itself allows for a procedure called pocket rescissions later in the year to be able to bank some of these savings without the bill actually being passed. It’s a provision that has been rarely used, but it is there, and we intend to use all of these tools. We want Congress to pass it where it’s necessary. We also have executive tools, and that is something we’re going to be working with Congress on. But it’s very important to pass this bill and to see whether there is a will on both the House and the Senate to secure the vote for it.
Dana Bash: Let me just unpack a couple of things that you said. First, you said that there is 200 years of precedent of presidents taking what Congress passed. And of course, people who are watching this know that the Constitution says that it is Congress that has the power of the purse, which is why we’re even having this discussion.
Russ Vought: They have the power.
Dana Bash: Well, that’s what I want to ask you about. So there’s some dispute about the 200 years. But most importantly, a law passed in 1974 because of this dispute that you mentioned—the Impoundment Control Act. And so, because of that law, which has now been in place for more than 50 years, it is the requirement of the executive branch—except for in situations where you’re having discussions with Congress—to implement what is signed into law. I know you don’t believe that that is constitutional. So are you just doing this in order to get the Supreme Court to rule that unconstitutional?
Russ Vought:We’re certainly not taking impoundment off the table. We’re not in love with the law. It’s the law that came after 200 years of precedent and history, at the lowest moment of the executive branch. But even the very Impoundment Control Act—notice it’s not called the Impoundment Elimination Act—even Congress at the time realized that impoundments were perfectly legal and appropriate. They were saying the Impoundment Control Act. Even the Impoundment Control Act allows for procedures that both require their assent on a rescissions bill—that’s the one that we’re sending up early this week—and also allow for pocket rescissions for those that come later in the next week.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/russ-vought-wrecks-cnns-dana-bash-budget-showdown/
2/2
Dana Bash:Congress says that you’re just breaking the law.
Russ Vought:Well, they’re wrong. We are not breaking the law. Every part of the federal government—each branch—has to look at the Constitution themselves and uphold it. And there’s tension between the branches. I don’t doubt that Congress is going to make accusations. Some of them come by their own watchdogs, but those watchdogs have been historically wrong.
And that’s not going to stop us from moving forward to bank the DOJPAs.
Dana Bash: I want to bring this up in a bigger picture, because this is part of a very clear strategy that you have had for years and years in order to really cut the federal government and do it in any way you can—and also to pull as much power into the executive branch as possible. You’re very open about that. One of the things that you said in 2023 was specific to federal workers. I want to play that for our viewers.
Russ Vought (Flashback):We want the bureaucrats to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains. We want to put them in trauma.
Dana Bash: Is that your goal as OMB Director?
Russ Vought:Look, I love how you cherry-picked the quote on “trauma.” What I was referring to there was the bureaucracy. We do believe there’s a weaponized bureaucracy. We do believe that there are people who have been part of administrations that are fundamentally woke and weaponized against the American people. When you have the EPA put a 77-year-old Navy veteran named Joe Robertson in jail for doing ponds to fight wildfires on his lawn—that’s not just the FBI, it’s the EPA. And we do want to defund and put those bureaucracies out of business.
But I have great people at OMB. There are great people at the FAA. There are great people at the NIH who are doing hard work and important public service activities. I think it’s important to provide the full context of what people like me have said in the past.
But we’re not going to receive pushback from the notion that we’re going to dramatically change the deep, woke, weaponized administrative state.
Dana Bash: Again, you’ve been very, very open about that being your goal. That’s what we have seen.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/russ-vought-wrecks-cnns-dana-bash-budget-showdown/
Bash was surprisingly polite with her rude, aggressive and accusatory questions
MSNBC Calls Illegal Alien Muslim Terrorist FROM EGYPT a “White Male”
by Jim Hoft Jun. 2, 2025 9:40 am286 Comments
They just can’t help themselves.
On Sunday, Mohamad Soliman, an illegal alien who entered the US from Egypt in 2022 during the Biden regime, attacked a Jewish gathering with alcohol and Molotov cocktails.
Several Jews were injured in the attack including children.
Soliman was brought into custody following the attack in Boulder, Colorado.
Authorities said the violent incident happened at 13th Street and Pearl Street on Sunday afternoon. Police asked everyone to avoid the area while first responders worked the scene.
The attacker was identified as Mohamad Soliman from Egypt. Several children were injured in the planned attack.
Bill Melugin from FOX News later reported that Mohamad Soliman is an illegal immigrant from Egypt who entered the country during the Biden years.
Soliman came in 2022 during the Biden regime and overstayed his visa and never left.
Despite the fact that Soliman was an illegal alien from Egypt, MSNBC insisted on labeling him a “white male.”
Soliman is a Muslim terrorist from Egypt.
“White male.”
Since when did the mainstream media describe Egyptians as white males or white females?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/msnbc-calls-illegal-alien-muslim-terrorist-egypt-white/
Coomer v. Lindell Trial is Set to Begin Today – What’s In? What’s Out? And Why Is It So Important? 1/2
by Brian Lupo Jun. 2, 2025 9:30 am
Hat tip to Ashe In America. Follow her on X @AsheInAmerica for frequent updates on the trial.
On Monday, Eric Coomer, former Director of Product Strategy and Security for Dominion Voting Systems, will face off against Mike Lindell, MyPillow, and FrankSpeech (consolidated as “Lindell”) in a lawsuit brought in federal court in Colorado.
Coomer is suing Lindell for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and civil conspiracy, claiming that Lindell’s conduct provoked “an onslaught of harassment and credible death threats issued against him.”
The lawsuit centers around alleged false claims and defamatory statements made by Mike Lindell as a result of accusations made by Joe Oltmann on The Conservative Daily Podcast (now Untamed) following the 2020 election.
Oltmann alleged that he had covertly infiltrated a phone call for ANTIFA members prior to the 2020 election. During the call, Oltmann claims a man identified as “Eric from Dominion” had ensured that President Trump would not win and that he “made effing sure of it.” After the 2020 election concluded, Oltmann believed “Eric from Dominion” on that call was likely Eric Coomer, the then-Director of Product Strategy and Security for Dominion Voting Systems.
Following the election, numerous vitriolic social media posts by Coomer against President Trump and anyone who supports him, including Coomer’s own family and co-workers, surfaced, some with demands that family and friends stop following him and unfriend him. In a 2021 New York Times article by Susan Dominus titled “He Was the ‘Perfect Villian’ for Voting Conspiracists,” Coomer does not dispute the posts but rather expresses regret that he didn’t delete them.
From the New York Times:
As Coomer watched the video, though, he felt a second strong emotion: a powerful sense of regret — because the Facebook posts were, in fact, authentic. Why, he thought, hadn’t he just deleted them? Coomer could imagine how his words would sound to just about any Republican, let alone someone already hearing on Fox News that Dominion was switching votes for Biden. He told me that he believed every word of what he said on Facebook, but when colleagues later asked him what he was thinking, he was frank: He had screwed up. At a time when well-funded efforts to sow mistrust in the election were already underway, Coomer had given conspiracy theorists a valuable resource, a grain of sand they could transform into something that had the feel — the false promise — of proof.
Some of these posts will be permitted as evidence during the trial starting on Monday, however, some key posts and interesting facts, as reported by the New York Times, will not.
In the Order on Motion in Limine (seeking exclusion of arguments or evidence from trial), Coomer had sought to preclude several “categories of evidence” from the trial (and the judge’s ruling on them):
Coomer’s September 2021 car accident – the judge will allow questioning about the accident during cross-examination but will not allow the body-cam footage to be viewed or any testimony beyond “the truthfulness of Coomer’s statements to police about his involvement in the accident)
his sex life – Granted because it was unopposed by Lindell’s defense
his drug and alcohol abuse – Granted
his religious beliefs or opinions – Granted
his opinions about law enforcement, Black Lives Matter movement, and related issues– Granted
his Facebook posts about President Trump– Denied
other assorted Facebook posts – Granted for the specific posts exemplified but denied for unspecified posts
a 118-page document titled “Eric Coomer: Pawn, Plant, or Perp?” – Granted
What’s Permitted
In September 2021, after the incident’s alleged in the lawsuit, Coomer was involved in an automobile accident in Colorado. He crashed his truck into a building and fled the scene to the bar he owned down the street. When he was confronted by police at the establishment, he denied any knowledge of the accident while telling police that he had just done some shots with the cook at the bar.
After an hour, while in the back of the police car in handcuffs, and after the police spoke with Coomer’s attorney on-scene, Coomer finally admitted that he hit the building and panicked.
This will be admitted for the purpose of evaluating his “truthfulness,” however, the body cam footage will not be admissible.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/updated-following-review-as-coomer-v-lindell-trial/
2/2
Social Media Posts About President Trump
Coomer’s vitriolic posts towards President Trump and anyone who would vote for him from 2016 through the 2020 election are permitted.
On July 21, 2016, Coomer wrote:
“If you are planning to vote for that autocratic, narcissitic, fascist ass-hat blowhard and his [C]hristian jihadist VP pic, UNFRIEND ME NOW! No, I’m not joking…Only an absolute FKING IDIOT could ever vote for that wind-bag f-tard FASCIST RACIST F!! No bulls*t. I don’t give a damn if you’re friend, family, or random acquaintance, pull the lever, mark an oval, touch a screen for that carnival barker…UNFRIEND ME NOW. I have no desire whatsoever to ever interact with you. You are beyond hope, beyond reason. You are controlled by fear, reaction and bullst. Get your sh*t together.
Oh, if that doesn’t persuade you, F YOU! Seriously, this fing ass-clown stands against everything that makes this country awesome! You want in on that? You deserve nothing but contempt.
In a “2nd edit” later in the post, he continued:
“these opinions are rational, and completely my own. They are based in reason and highly credible (emphasis added). Though they are not necessarily the thoughts of my employer, though if not, I should probably find another job…Who wants to work for complete morons? None of my personal opinions affect my professional conduct or attitudes. I am non-partisan. I am not, however, willing to stand by and watch this great country be taken over by fascists without saying something, anything.”
Dominus wrote in her article about Dominion’s efforts to set up guardrails for employees to “express themselves” given the sensitivities of their profession:
“Coomer was part of several conversations among Dominion employees about how to balance their right to express themselves with the sensitivities specific to their industry. Dominion also searched through its employees’ social media accounts, checking for comments or tweets that might reflect poorly on the company. No one ever raised any concerns with Coomer about his posts, because his posts were only available to his Facebook friends.”
While Coomer rejects the idea that his unhinged but “rational,” “completely [his] own,” and “based in reason and highly credible” social media posts could affect his work in any way, he said he’d be willing to quit his job if they (his employer) didn’t agree with his ideology (“I should probably find another job…who wants to work for complete morons?”) and that he “can’t stand by and watch this great country be taken over without saying something.”
Lastly, on June 2, 2020, Coomer posted a de facto “Antifa Manifesto” titled, “To All Media: Public Statement From “ANTIFA” in Response to the Threats Issued by United States President Donald J. Trump”
In it, they claim “‘ANTIFA’ isn’t an organization. There’s no membership, no meetings, no dues, no rules, no leaders, no structure. It is, literally, an idea and nothing more” in a “Public Statement from ‘ANTIFA'” that was posted by the person who “maintained the ‘AntiFa’ page on Facebook since founding it in 2017.”
The trial begins today in federal court in Denver, CO and is expected to run approximately 10 days. Check back with The Gateway Pundit for updates.
The Gateway Pundit reached out to the Coomer camp for comment on this report.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/updated-following-review-as-coomer-v-lindell-trial/
Warrior prayers up for Lindell through the entire court case. He was on the verge of bankruptcy 3-4 years ago, Bannon helpedhim get more sales for a years by having him on daily and talking about not even his company but the challenges his was going through. He was attacked not only by Dominion but hundreds of other companies. They smeared his name and company and box stores dropped his products.
This win means the difference from life and death! And more harassment
He said the other day the FBI took his phone four years ago and still he has not got it back.
There was a 132 parties suing Dominion, they all had to settle because they were bled dry. Mike Lindell is the last man and warrior standing for Trump, the voters and the United States of America. This fight almost killed him, but he stood his ground.
Deep Prayers requested for Lindell’s win on this, for the next 10+ days, it will rid Dominion voting systems from the US, especially in federal elections. Although they could be used for state elections
Zelensky and Kiev have no prevented him from walking away. I’m sure Trump is gathering all IC reports and investigating who were involved in Ukraines plan to cause WWIII, to create war in Europe and elsewhere.
Zelensky taking victory laps was an admission that him, the military, rogue CIA and corrupt Senators, other countries that hate Russia and supposed EU and European Allies were in on it.
This cannot stand and Zelensky and many others are going down.The question is why his Envoy, Kellogg did not know about the plans or why he didn’t reportit back to Rubio and the President. Something very fishy about him and this situation..
Trump given 'no heads up' on largest Ukraine drone strike since beginning of war
Senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy reports on President Donald Trump's reaction to Ukraine's drone strikes of Russia ahead of peace talks in Turkey and China rejecting the president's claim that they violated the 90-day trade deal.
2:45
https://youtu.be/UA20ei8Ge8A
Elon Musk breaks from Trump: 'We have differences in opinion'
Fox News contributor Joe Concha discusses Democrats' defense of former President Joe Biden as concerns grow regarding his cognitive decline while in office and Elon Musk's confession that he doesn't always agree with President Donald Trump. (Why us that even a mention, Musk it said it many times, he has free speech, now they are trying to insinuate the relationship is fallen apart, Fox leading the way.)
Dems refusing to discuss Bidan, Clinton coming out lying, this is their strategy
6:93
https://youtu.be/qsqupUtPnL4
Colorado terror suspect reveals shocking plans to feds
Constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley discusses the charges against the suspect in the attack on a rally for Israeli hostages as new details are revealed about his intention.
5:38
https://youtu.be/Atp2p7090Hs