Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 2:56 p.m. No.23133018   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3052

>>23132915

they report false information.

the name is 'Gulf of America'.

If they want to be clearer they can caveat that with 'which used to be called Gulf of Mexico'

 

they cease to be news and start to be propaganda so why would they be allowed in the press room?

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 3:14 p.m. No.23133089   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3100

>>23133052

I never said that I get to decide what they publish.

but they publish false information.

and thus the White House gets to decide if they can sit down at a White House press conference.

They make the choice to publish false information as propaganda to 'stick it' to The President.

And because of this wise people say 'they don't have a seat in the room during a White House press conference.

 

why do you have such a hard time understanding that?

 

Weekly World News and Real Raw News don't have a seat in the room either because they also publish false information, but in their cases it's for entertainment and not propaganda.

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 3:20 p.m. No.23133114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3118

>>23133100

The white house doesn't tell them what to publish.

but they publish false information so the white house says 'you can't have a seat in the room'.

no one at the white house is telling them what to publish.

they make the choice, and so does the White house to exclude them. Freedom of choice all around.

 

In your world they would be free to publish what ever they want, I agree that's correct.

but the consequences of publishing false information results in the White House decision to exclude them from the press room.

in your world you'd take away the freedom that the White House has to allow your frens, propagandists, to squat in a chair that someone else might be better suited to use.

someone else who doesn't willfully publish false information.

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 3:22 p.m. No.23133123   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3125

>>23133118

that's not feasible, anon.

the logistics of that would be that the press conference would have to be held in a stadium.

 

So the White House has to limit it to people who they want.

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 3:25 p.m. No.23133133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3144 >>3244 >>3345

>>23133125

if that were the case then chances are NO QUALIFIED JOURNALISTS would win the 'lottery' that you suggest.

again: you only want freedom for those who you support. The Trump administration you want placed under restrictions.

 

I'm done anon. you can post back to me but I won't answer you anymore.

you don't use logic nor do you care about honest reporting.

you don't care about the liberty that the administration should have to perform to the best of their ability.

you're what I'd call an obstructionist.

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 3:41 p.m. No.23133220   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3244

>>23133172

is that all you got?

you tell me what you delude I understand?

the White House should be open for your frens?

so you can subvert the president?

that's 'free speech'?

 

those who report false information are slaves to their need to propagandize.

they are not free, and their speach is very costly as it spreads falsehood.

so how is it 'free'?

oh, because it should be free for them?

they should be able to print what they want because you support their politics?

 

seriously you live in a dream world of privledge, anon.

in your world you can do what you want and every one else must be subjected to your falsehoods.

 

again: they can print what they want.

printing misinformation has consequences.

and the consequences: President Trump doesn't want them around him.

 

easy peasy.

Anonymous ID: 1fbade June 6, 2025, 4 p.m. No.23133313   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3345

>>23133277

ah, the 'you are a liar' slander.

no, anon, I'm not.

we disagree. you're opinion is a partisan one.

you indicate 'freedom of the press' but in fact your point is just to stick it to the president.

 

no, anon, i'm not a liar. I don't bare false witness, and I understand why the Associated press is excluded.

Did I ever say that I want to be?

did I?

are you sure you're fair in slandering me?

of course not.

 

anyway, the privledge of the marxist left is OVER.

your class will no longer be able to blow you dog-whistles and make the rest of us fall into step to enable your unholy hedgemony over so much of the business and industry and publishing.

Sorry, anon, your tribe has to play fair now.

your privledge is deprecated.

your slander is noted.

and you are worthy of being excluded.

publish your crap, I don't have to read it, anon.