You do realize it's 1st amendment protected right to publish that information right?
Your first amendment right can't be turned into obstruction, the Supreme Court was very clear on this in 1987. They can't turn your first amendment right into a crime because it "interferes" with governments objectives, that's the purpose of the first amendment. We have a RIGHT to publish that information, and we have a RIGHT to oppose and challenge them.
You catch fish with bait, he's done a good job exposing domestic enemies.
Except it is true, you're just an enemy to the constitution and deny that right.
You do keep posting falsehoods.
Protected speech is not obstruction jackass, the Supreme Court was very clear about this.
What law enforcement does is not classified, it's public information the public has a RIGHT to know and publish.
I've done nothing to subvert it, I defend it. You project.
Free speech is about free speech. YOU claim our right to free speech is void when government says so, even though the constitution forbids government that authority.
Again, a constitutionally protected RIGHT can not be considered interference. Back in 1987 the US Supreme Court invalidated as unconstitutional a Houston Texas Ordinance that read:
>It shall be unlawful for any person to assault, strike or in any manner oppose, molest, abuse or interrupt any policeman in the execution of his duty, or any person summoned to aid in making an arrest.
The court reasoned that your first amendment right COULD NOT be criminalized, as it's your RIGHT.
Justice William J. Brennan Jr., who authored the Court’s opinion, wrote that:
>“the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers.”
He added that the “freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.”
Cops unlawfully arrest people for obstruction ALL THE TIME, then citizens pay their victims because what their victims were doing was constitutionally protected and not interference.
>I’ll be surprised if there’s any police left in this country in little over 12 hours time
How many do you think will ignore the standdown order?
So your rights only exist in a time manner and place government approves of?
For what dipshit? Free speech? Standing for the constitution? Calling out domestic enemies violating it?
Heard that bullshit before.
Not with me, they fuck with the weak so they can feel powerful. Nothing a cop hates more than someone that sees them for the domestic enemies they are and doesn't cower.
Which is exactly why domestic enemies are going to face consequences.
They're so stupid it would be comical if not so sad.
>youre a fuckin hermit dude
Interesting claim. You accuse me of crying about cops fucking with me then accuse me of being a hermit and asking when I have police contact. Notice two opposite claims, both blindly, because I call out lawless cops.
America is in the middle of an attack, by those who claim to be protecting her.
Watch vids of cops with auditors, they don't hide it, they're quite open with their hatred of transparency and the people who don't cower.
Why should I answer you? You've made two opposing claims in your desperation to throw something and make it stick.
The last contact I had was me complaining to a department about cops committing a felony on video and was told "Go back to your mommy’s spare bedroom and get a juice box before you take your afternoon nap"
Great interaction with a citizen huh?
No, I watch cops commit crimes because auditors shine a light.
Why do you say that? I'm not the pussy backing domestic enemies violating our constitution am I? You filter after projecting because you have nothing else.
Imagine believing a sheriff has authority to decide protestors assembly is unlawful kek
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Or government assets trying to get it shutdown.
Free speech can not be obstruction, this is long settled law. Freedom of press also protects the right to gather and record law enforcement actions and to publish that information.
So you want someone standing for the ACTUAL constitution and law to die. Got it.
No, you just don't want what I post to be true.
Let me ask you, do you understand the constitution and bill of rights limits what government can do? Do you understand it forbids government from infringing upon certain rights, such as freedom of speech? If you do, why do you believe government has authority to override that?
We have freedom of speech to say what government doesn't want us to say, and freedom of press to publish what government doesn't want us to publish.
As I posted earlier in this bread, in 1987 the US Supreme Court invalidated as unconstitutional a Houston Texas Ordinance that read:
>It shall be unlawful for any person to assault, strike or in any manner oppose, molest, abuse or interrupt any policeman in the execution of his duty, or any person summoned to aid in making an arrest.
The court reasoned that your first amendment right COULD NOT be criminalized, as it's your RIGHT.
Justice William J. Brennan Jr., who authored the Court’s 8-1 majority opinion, wrote that:
>“the First Amendment protects a significant amount of verbal criticism and challenge directed at police officers.”
He added that the “freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state.”
Free speech can't be interference.
No. Our rights are above government. It's no more lawful for the feds than it is a city.
Do you know nothing about the constitution?
Prohibition was an amendment, and it was repealed. Why do you believe the feds haven't gone after the states who legalized weed? Because the feds never had the authority to criminalize it.
Wrong. Any LEO violating constitutionally protected rights is a domestic enemy and should be treated as such.
Quite the projection. Who told you I was without community? There's many of us who see the domestic enemies in blue for what they really are.
I've been telling people here every branch of government has violated the constitution and it must be admitted.
Those who stand for and defend our rights and constitution are criminals? What crime have I committed? What have I been convicted of?
Quite the mental gymnastics you're doing there.
Where do you get that accusation from? How am I standing FOR the steamrolling of the rights of others? I'm speaking for the rights of others, against both liberals and conservatives.
They really do want to be ruled over huh?
You're always crying.