sounds far fetched.
why would Trump let the overlord psychopath class destroy all the innocent people of Israel who just want to live in peace?
the go-to-the-top favorite children of the overlords who rule in Israel will be safe in their miami homes if anything bad happens in Israel.
as well as Bibi.
if he 'dies' he'll be like Elvis, no one will be sure if he's really dead.
so you posit that most Israelis aren't even there anymore?
Miami or somewhere other than Israel where rich overlords like to hang out.
Mine is speculation.
I hope that it all works out and Israel does not get nuked.
anyone who is of that mind, and there are legions of violent people who would.
Hamas, for example.
cool story, bro. I knew you were going to post that.
do a dig and tell us
-
that this really happened
-
why it happened
-
who did it.
you seem to be a time waster shill who task-masters with unanswerable questions to waste other people's time.
ya, I'm not going to do this dance with you.
Bibi isn't my favorite person, and I doubt he'll ever be put on trial for all the horrible things he's instigated. We're on the same page with that.
however, the idea that Israel orchestrated the attack, to me, has always been a shill narrative.
It might be that Alex and Huma are being given the wedding present of a civil war.
Will their guests all be toasting the happy couple while America burns on Saturday?
maybe the wedding can be like the Hotel California: you can check in but you can't ever leave.
2000 uninvited marines with arrest warrents for treason who surround the place might be a good birthday gift for the 250th anivresary of the United States Army.
my counter narrative is for entertainment purposes only.
The left thinks that they can keep up their jetset ways while they encourage the burning down of all the cities which they hold captive.
they pay for riots and then says "this is the president's fault".
clearly the Democrat talking point is, as it's been for a long time:
everything is always Trump's fault.
"Schiff: Trump Is an ‘Arsonist Trying to Set Fire’ to L.A."
https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/06/11/schiff-trump-is-an-arsonist-trying-to-set-fire-to-l-a/
"Waters: Trump Started L.A. Riots, ‘He Should Not Continue to Support Violence’"
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/06/11/waters-trump-started-l-a-riots-he-should-not-continue-to-support-violence/
that's just two examples of parrots of the democrat party blaming Trump for stuff that people they claim are their constituents are doing.
I am reminded of what Lot said when told about the impending destruction of the city he was in.
how many innocents are not enough?
Texas was already an independant country by 1846.
Most of the America South West was inhabited by indiginous groups such as the Hopi, The Zuni, the Apache and very many others.
The New Mexicans were glad to become part of the United States as they were very very far away from any 'Mexican' institutions. They were far off in the wilderness and welcomed the Americans with little or no resistance.
in 1853 the Mexicans SOLD a large tract of land to the United States which is called the 'Gadsden Purchase' so that kind of verified that
>that Mexico really did agree to cede all that land.
The United States vanquished Mexico in that war and could have decided to keep it all, but didn't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_Purchase
yes. And it annexed by the United States in 1845
from Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Texas
"
Texas was annexed by the United States on December 29, 1845,[7] and was admitted to the Union as the 28th state on that day, with the transfer of power from the Republic to the new state of Texas formally taking place on February 19, 1846.[8] However, the United States inherited the southern and western border disputes with Mexico, which had refused to recognize Texas' sovereignty or to accept U.S. offers to purchase the territory. Consequently, the annexation led to the Mexican–American War.
"
https://www.legendsofnativeamerica.com/region_southwest/index.php
I've seen something else about it that disputes what you say.
it was a French anti-cleric . . . and it became popular before 1717.
maybe the first lodge got to London in 1717, but other sources dispute that as the start date of Free Masonry.
I don't buy into the whole 'we ran it all since the pyramids' BS narrative that they give.
God helps everyone, anon.
if you turn your back to Him he'll let you walk away. As soon as you realize your mistake you notice he's right there with you again if you are so astute to be able to see it.
the love He gives might seem punative to those who violate His precepts, but it's all consequence of behavior from the free will He has given as a gift to humans.
don't hold your breath on that one, anon.
you seem like a fake persona.
the paradox in making that statement is very humorous.
https://biblehub.com/proverbs/26-7.htm
New International Version
"Like the useless legs of one who is lame is a proverb in the mouth of a fool."
there are many different translations of this.
no sauce
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/ahmedabad-air-india-flight-crash-full-passenger-list-released-includes-ex-cm-vijay-rupani/articleshow/121801719.cms
passenger list for the dead or said-to-be dead.
sorry, anon, no it's not.
The problem with Lynch is that he is from a state that doesn't have honest elections and non of the congress people represent the state, but only their political clan.
there never was 'one goal that most Americans can agree on'
It was always a false consensus.
what we did have was a media that could con enough of the public to think that there was a consensus, or a majority, agreeing to the depravity of the banksters and their minions.
hasn't it been shown that the agitators aren't really Mexicans?
good for you. I see you're also trained in being a nasty person who starts swearing when being challenged. I'm sure that your trainers are very happy you're doing their bidding.