Anonymous ID: 938581 June 12, 2025, 7:27 p.m. No.23168962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8980

>>23168946

Yes, it is. You haven't figured out what Trump is doing yet huh? Q told you we have to "free up" and demonstrate who has authority. Trump is losing on purpose, returning power.

 

The plan after Trump.

Anonymous ID: 938581 June 12, 2025, 7:32 p.m. No.23169002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9013 >>9014 >>9031 >>9062

>>23168980

Only in certain conditions which were not met. That's why Q asked what conditions have to be met, they weren't. Trump did itKNOWINGLY

 

A plan for after Trump. Gotta demonstrate who really has authority, and it's not the king you so desperately want.

Anonymous ID: 938581 June 12, 2025, 7:34 p.m. No.23169022   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9034

>>23169006

I agree, but everyone in government seems to have forgotten that. Gun control, civil asset forfeiture, no recording in public trial, no peaceful assembly outside a judges home etc. They can read the constitution for themselves, but the chains that bind their minds, the chain of command, reigns supreme.

Anonymous ID: 938581 June 12, 2025, 7:36 p.m. No.23169035   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9140

>>23169014

>>23169013

 

Read a bible, as Q said this is biblical. They wanted a king, a SOLO ruler with ultimate authority. God was angry at that.

 

Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is Liberty. Not a bunch of tyrant assholes looking for loopholes to violate the constitution.

Anonymous ID: 938581 June 12, 2025, 7:59 p.m. No.23169170   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9178 >>9186 >>9192

>>23169140

>your movement

 

I am not part of any no kings "movement", which is controlled opposition. I simply believe in the Constitution, and no king, whether it be Trump, Obama, or any of the others, no matter how much some want one.

 

Violating the constitution is not ok just because it's your "side". The left wing and the right wing both belong to the same bird. So, how would POTUS make sure there's a plan to limit the "king like" authority of future presidents?