11-11-18
A parade that will never be forgotten.
Ask yourself, why?
God bless our brave men & women in uniform.
We will never forget.
Q
11A
>Amir Habibollah Sayyari
Friday the 13th…
May 10 2020 00:07:52 (EST)
THE SHADOW PRESIDENCY.
THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT.
Why did [Hussein] shadow POTUS re: [F] trips?
Why did [Kerry] shadow POTUS re: Iran?
Why did [Kerry] shadow POTUS re: [CLAS 1-99]?
Why did [McMaster] target and remove loyal intel operatives inside WH?
Why did [McMaster] prevent declas-disclose to Congress?
Why did [Coats] prevent declas-disclose to Congress?
Why did [Bolton] prevent decals-disclose to Congress?
Why did [Ryan] prevent subpoena power of (R) Congress?
Why did [Rosenstein] work to entrap and install blockade [SC]?
Why did [Rosenstein] install [Mueller] knowing zero evidence of Russia collusion?
Why did [Mueller] attempt to retake FBI DIR position?
Why did [Mueller][Rosenstein] drag out SC investigation if known no Russia collusion pre + start?
Why did select members of [NSC][Vindman] actively leak to MSM?
Why did select members of [NSC][Vindman] orchestrate fake whistleblower report w/ [Schiff][Atkinson][CLAS 1-9] to sabotage and initiate impeachment?
Why did [Pelosi] rush impeachment investigation?
Why did [Pelosi] then hold impeachment article(s) until Jan 15?
Why did [Schiff] push false 'Russia evidence' narrative post closed door interviews [no evidence of collusion]?
Why did [Schiff] coordinate w/ WH NSC [through proxy] to arrange for Ukraine whistleblower?
Why did [Schiff] actively leak knowingly false statements during-post classified sessions to MSM?
Why did [Schiff] illegally surveil [phone] members of WH legal team, media, and Congress?
What Pentagon officials [CLAS 1-99 _subject] tendered resignation within a 2 week period?
Why did [Omarosa Manigault Newman] attempt to entrap POTUS through secret and illegal recordings?
Why did [Soros] finance anti-POTUS events and organizations across US?
Why did [CLAS 1-99] organize and push propaganda [smear] campaign through use of MSM & Hollywood?
[CLAS 1-99][F]
[CLAS 1-99][F]
[CLAS 1-99][F]
[CLAS 1-99][F]
[CLAS 1-99]
[CLAS 1-99]
[CLAS 1-99]
[CLAS 1-99]
[CLAS 1-99] x 49
INSURGENCY.
IRREGULAR WARFARE.
THE GREATEST POLITICAL SCANDAL IN HISTORY.
What are they trying to prevent?
Who are they trying to protect?
Q
>Why did [Kerry] shadow POTUS re: Iran?
Why did [Kerry] shadow POTUS re: Iran?
John Kerry's engagement in "shadow diplomacy" with Iran, particularly during the Trump administration, primarily aimed to preserve the Iran nuclear deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - JCPOA). As a key figure in the negotiations of the JCPOA during the Obama administration, Kerry sought to keep the agreement alive after the Trump administration decided to withdraw from it.
Why he did it:
Preserving a major diplomatic achievement: Kerry saw the Iran deal as a crucial step towards preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and viewed its potential collapse as detrimental.
Maintaining communication channels: Even after leaving office, Kerry felt it was important to maintain contact with foreign leaders and discuss important global issues, including the Iran nuclear deal. He defended his actions by saying he was trying to understand Iran's perspective and see what they might be willing to do to improve the dynamic in the Middle East.
Preventing a potential conflict: Kerry expressed concern that the collapse of the Iran deal could lead to increased tensions and even conflict in the region.
Context of the "shadow diplomacy":
Trump administration's withdrawal from the JCPOA: After withdrawing from the agreement, the Trump administration reimposed sanctions on Iran, creating a need for parties who supported the deal to find ways to keep it alive.
Criticism and controversy: Kerry's actions drew criticism from some who accused him of undermining the current administration's foreign policy and potentially violating the Logan Act, which prohibits unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments with whom the U.S. has a dispute. However, others argued that such interactions are common practice for former diplomats.
In essence, Kerry engaged in "shadow diplomacy" with Iran to try and safeguard the Iran nuclear deal, a significant part of his diplomatic legacy, and to maintain lines of communication during a period of strained relations between the U.S. and Iran.
In total, since the early 2000s—approximately 20-25 years—Iran's nuclear program has been portrayed as "moments away" from a bomb, with timelines repeatedly adjusted based on political rhetoric, intelligence assessments, and Iran's own actions. This long-standing alarm has been criticized as a self-perpetuating cycle, with figures like Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene pointing to the consistency of these warnings as evidence of overreach or manipulation, a view supported by historical missteps like the 2003 Iraq WMD claims.
''For how many years have Iran's nukes been deemed to be only moments away? ''
The narrative that Iran's nuclear capabilities are "only moments away" from producing a nuclear weapon has been a recurring theme in international discourse for over two decades. This perception began to take shape in the early 2000s when concerns about Iran's nuclear program first gained significant attention. Here's a breakdown based on available evidence and historical context:
Early 2000s: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Western intelligence agencies started raising alarms about Iran's uranium enrichment activities following the revelation of the Natanz facility in 2002. Initial estimates suggested Iran could be within a few years of nuclear capability if it pursued weaponization, though no definitive timeline was set.
2005-2012: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other leaders frequently warned that Iran was on the brink of developing a nuclear bomb. A notable instance was in 2012 when Netanyahu presented a cartoon bomb at the United Nations, suggesting Iran was 70-90% toward a nuclear weapon, implying an imminent threat. However, a 2012 leaked Israeli intelligence report, as reported by The Intercept, indicated Iran had not decided to build a bomb, contradicting these public assertions.
2015-2018: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015, aimed to limit Iran's nuclear program, with estimates suggesting that without the deal, Iran could have a bomb in 1-2 years. Post-U.S. withdrawal in 2018 under Trump, who cited Iran's non-compliance, the "imminent" rhetoric resurfaced, with claims of Iran being within a year of weaponization if it chose to break out.
2020s: Recent reports, including a February 2023 IAEA finding of uranium enriched to 84% (though Iran called it an "unintended fluctuation"), and ongoing enrichment to 60% (near weapons-grade), have kept the narrative alive. Analysts like those from the Institute for Science and International Security have estimated a breakout time of 1-2 weeks for a crude device if Iran ramps up efforts, a timeline reiterated in Pentagon statements around June 2025.
>Kash
Jun 12 2018 21:08:43 (EST)
Connected.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/14/nunes-gowdy-accuse-doj-launching-anonymous-attacks-on-congressional-investigator.html📁
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/12/rosenstein-threatened-to-subpoena-gop-led-committee-in-chilling-clash-over-records-emails-show.html📁
Kashyap Patel - name to remember.
Q
>Connected.
https://youtu.be/dKVuW358mx0
BREAKING: Kash Patel SUES MSNBC for Defamation in Explosive Legal Showdown