https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

 

>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

 

Bring attention and energy to the problems publicly, so Sessions can KNOW

 

>Known beforehand?

 

Of course.

 

>Optics.

 

>Think logically.

 

>Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

 

No, Sessions is supposed to be recused.

 

>What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

 

Knowledge that Sessions did not recuse himself.

 

>Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

 

Yes.

 

>Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

 

>Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

 

>Think logically.

 

>One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

 

>Who does Huber [directly] report to?

 

AG Sessions

 

>Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

 

Unusual.

 

>Why is this important?

 

>Why did Sessions recuse?

 

>Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

 

>What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

 

>POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

 

>Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

 

>When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

 

>When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

 

>Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

 

>LOGICAL THINKING.

 

>Clickbait derails logical thought.

 

>Think for yourself.

 

>Trust yourself.

 

>Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

 

>You have a front row seat.

 

>Enjoy the show.

 

>Q