>>2317971 (pb)
Yes, I thought about that after I wrote it and realize many of the pornographic butt shots, over and over, of the "Thank Baker" variety are likely some idiot trying to mock us.
The more attention one give to the provocateurs, the more they have succeeded.
Anyway, "All work and no play makes "X" a boring person"
The ethos of the board is fixed over a long period and the "Thank Baker" is a tradition.
But you are correct that it is likely being Hijacked.
I just skip over things like that and it doesn't bother me.
Giving a head's up to newbies might be reserved for the newbie board, otherwise it seems the tip to newbies is itself and harassment and put down of the board.
But the true obsession [maybe not using the word in the same way you did] with particular female body parts is fetishistic. And objectify woman. I don't agree with the so - called Right Wing party line 100% . But I accept the ethos of this board, which is free speech, and skip over what is obnoxious [and there is a lot of that - which is no kidding deliberate and not an accident]
To add something of hopeful note here and not to be a complete slide, but Lisa Page appears to be another smirker. A large percentage of pedos tend to be smirkers. What are the chances considering her closeness with co-smirker; weirdo Strzoks. Was there affair just built around a common love of babies? There was an example of that constellation in one of the Blind Drops from Hollywood. [allegedly Sheen and the woman who just attempted suicide; his ex companion]