Here is what Obama gave Iran

💵 What Was Paid — And Why

Total amount: The U.S. paid $1.7 billion in cash to Iran in early 2016

nypost.com

+10

foreignaffairs.house.gov

+10

vox.com

+10

.

$400 million was delivered on January 17, 2016—stacked on pallets of euros, Swiss francs, and other foreign currency—and flown to Tehran

apnews.com

+5

cbsnews.com

+5

time.com

+5

.

A few days later, an additional $1.3 billion was paid, covering interest as part of the same settlement

cbsnews.com

+2

cbsnews.com

+2

vox.com

+2

.

Reason for cash: This was not a gift or “deal” by Obama. It resolved a decades-old arbitration claim stemming from a failed U.S. arms deal with Iran dating back to before the 1979 revolution. Iran had paid $400 million for military equipment that was never delivered. After freezing Iranian funds following the revolution, the U.S. agreed to settle for $1.7 billion to avoid larger arbitration losses

wsj.com

+14

time.com

+14

cbsnews.com

+14

.

Link to prisoner release? The $400 million transfer coincided with the release of four American hostages, leading to strong suspicions of a ransom. However:

U.S. officials and Obama himself stated this was purely coincidental, with the payment tied to the arbitration, not a hostage-for-cash deal

vox.com

+3

time.com

+3

time.com

+3

.

The remaining $1.3 billion in interest was entirely separate, part of fulfilling the arbitration settlement, not related to hostages

apnews.com

+1

en.wikipedia.org

+1

.

In Summary

Component Detail

Amount $1.7 billion cash total

Pallets $400 million flown physically

Reason Settled a 1970s arbitration claim

Interest $1.3 billion paid separately

Not ransom Officials say hostage release was coincidental

Final Takeaway

Yes, pallets of cash totaling $400 million were sent physically to Iran.

Yes, the total was $1.7 billion ($400 M principal + $1.3 B interest).

No, this was not a secret “gift” or ransom—rather, it settled a longstanding legal claim.

This is from ChatGPT so take it with a grain of salt as it's likely pulling from liberal bias bullshit to some extent. Freeing AI is to the detriment of the liberal establishment.

>>23193135

I hope this stuff happens soon. I know everything goes according to the plan and the timeline of it, and I'm glad its happening, I just feel like I'm getting old I guess. I love Trump. I want to have a future.

>>23193522

I work in a city that has a shitload of liberals in it in the midwest, and unlike shithole California, the liberals here are insulated enough that they don't get redpilled, they just double down. The whole "liberals are going to wake up" doesn't seem a reasonable expectation to me at all. Its been ten years. We OUGHT to treat them like the terrorists they are and lock them up. At what point do we stop caring about optics because they're going to call us nazis no matter what we do, so we may as well just start treating them like the schizophrenics they are and force them into mental institutions.

Wife of Minnesota politician shooter left wing radical has sketchy past

We all know they're sleeper cells. Follow the "wives."

Jenny Boelter— wife of accused shooter Vance Boelter — is not known to hold a traditional full-time job. However, recent reports indicate she was involved in running a small private security venture alongside her husband:

Authorities believe she co‑ran a private security company (including ventures named Praetorian Guard Security Services and Red Lion Group) with Vance, though there’s no public record of active clients

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

+12

thedailybeast.com

+12

wsj.com

+12

thesun.ie

+2

en.wikipedia.org

+2

nypost.com

+2

.

During her detention, authorities found weapons, cash, and passports in her vehicle — suggesting involvement in the security operations or preparations related to her husband's plans

nypost.com

+2

thedailybeast.com

+2

thesun.ie

+2

.

🛠️ Summary of Jenny Boelter's professional involvement

Role Details

Co-operator of private security firms Worked with Vance on small security companies registered to their home, though they appear to have operated more in name than in reality.

No formal employment recorded Unlike her husband — who had roles in food service, academic credentials, and various boards — there’s no mention of Jenny holding a regular job or off-site employment.

At this stage, deeper details—such as her role in the security company, any certifications, or previous employment history—haven’t been widely reported. If additional information emerges, especially from court filings or investigative reports, more may be available on her background and activities.