some nice glasses you got there
imagine if they would all just smoke a joint and think about things
world peace is only ever 5 minutes away
>Probably not the best time for a wedding
if anon was about to be nuked by jews, it might be a good time to do some marriage
>In the Bible, marriage, or holy matrimony, is established by God as a union between a man and a woman, intended for companionship, procreation, and the raising of children. It's seen as a sacred covenant, reflecting Christ's relationship with the Church
so which constitutional amendment or US law covers your claim of:
>We have a RIGHT to use force against law enforcement unlawfully siezing us
also try the spellcheck feature, this website's chat box automatically applies the red squiggle lines of typo before you hit send
<siezing
<recognised
one of these middle east countries must have discovered a biblical truth that the other country doesn't want exposed
why else could they possibly be willing to go to nukes? clearly nobody cares about all the other shit they have been doing forever, something bigger than usual
is it a coincidence that this is the preamble on wiki? re: your Bad Elk vs United States example
>This case has been widely cited on the internet, but is no longer considered good law in a growing number of jurisdictions. Most states have, either by statute or by case law, removed the unlawful arrest defense for resisting arrest.
SC precedent should stand, just sucks you'd be dead from resisting before you had a chance to go to court over it nowadays
if some states/judges can uphold their decision to overrule this SC case, and have that hold up now in court, has a SC precedent ever really mattered?
or just like everything else, only when convenient to (them)
>Nobody can have nuclear weapons…
>Because nukes are FAKE and ghey.
think people would be standing around arguing semantics if it were 1000 ICBMs overhead instead?
ps also think nukes are fake and gay, these fags haven't split atoms, look how retarded they are