TYB
-
He's not "British" FFS
-
He's one of them, so of course he's going to stand between the people and their oil. He'll also stand between the world and their oil. Just like every other fucking government does.
British. FFS.
Should have de-funded them when we had the chance. One thing nice about Blue States/cities. The cops are scared.
>if you guys think the fbi is still nigger
Personally I'll never trust them. Same for all the alphabets that don't exist in the Constitution. Fuck them all. If they want to "rebuild trust" they can imprison 98% of themselves.
>Seems to me that some form of digital currency is inevitable
See ha's the thing. We already have digital currency. Say it to yourself and remember it.
What we don't have is a Social Credit score. With "crypto", if centralized, we will have SCS, and at that point. we're even more "cattle" than we are now. Liquid, ANONYMOUS physical currency = Freedom.
"Warp Speed saved millions of lives"
If it's not CBDC it's fine. Just another hipster "cash" account. I don't think he's pushing a centralized crypto, but I could be wrong.
sauce that, Mr. Can't Stop Posting.
Red Flag laws, yep. Pretty fucked.
But if you don't act like a faggot, nobody is going to be able to red flag you to LE.
It's wrong, I agree. But a good reminder to keep your shit straight if nothing else.
In the context of the video he's talking about red flag laws. I.e., your wife ends up in the ER because you beat her almost to death. Yeah, at hat point, fuck your 2A rights. What fucking "due process" would be required for that? You just fucked yourself by beating your wife. The point is not everyone should have all their "rights". i.e., criminals.
A court saying "fuck this guys 2A" is due process.
''Red flag laws (also known as Extreme Risk Protection Orders or ERPOs) allow courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others. While these laws have been enacted in 21 states and the District of Columbia, truly high-profile legal cases—those with significant national media attention—are relatively rare, as most ERPOs are issued in local courts and often involve private individuals. However, several notable cases and incidents illustrate how these laws have been used or debated:
-
Supreme Court Case: United States v. Rahimi (2024)
The U.S. Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of a federal law prohibiting individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms. This law operates similarly to red flag laws, as it allows courts to temporarily restrict gun ownership for those deemed dangerous, specifically in domestic violence contexts.
The plaintiff, Zackey Rahimi, challenged the law, arguing it violated the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court upheld the law, setting a precedent for the limits of gun rights in the context of public safety and red flag provisions.
-
Douglas County, Colorado (2020)
A judge granted an ERPO against a man in his sixties with a documented history of concerning and threatening behavior, including repeated police calls and threats to his ex-wife. Authorities removed 59 guns and 50,000 rounds of ammunition from his home.
-
Mercer County, New Jersey (2019)
Police acted on an anonymous tip about a 27-year-old man who made alarming threats on social media, including a threat to attack a Walmart. A court issued an ERPO, and police seized seven guns and numerous rounds of ammunition from two apartments.
-
Washington State Red Flag Hearing (2020)
In a case featured by CBS News, police filed an affidavit alleging threatening behavior by a gun owner. The judge ordered the temporary removal of firearms, and the owner was banned from buying guns for a year. This case highlighted the typical process and legal scrutiny involved in ERPO hearings.
Notable Non-Use: Highland Park, Illinois Shooting (2022)
The Highland Park mass shooting is a high-profile example where the state's red flag law was not used, despite prior warnings and police involvement with the shooter. This case is often cited in debates over the effectiveness and implementation of red flag laws.''
>Trump wants to give immunity to all law enforcement
I agree that's complete bullshit and should never happen.
>in order to prove you aren't illegal?
No. There will be no "chipping" just like there was no "jabbing"…. ready for whatever consequences come. Hopefully enough of us will say "fuck that", and it will never happen to the majority of people. If it turns out Americans are fucking gay enough to accept getting chipped, I'll see you inawoods.