Police chief got fired for this - but now he’s wearing a badge again like nothing ever happened.
For those who don't know, tazers are not to be used to force a non violent person into compliance.
Now since that officer was a threat, and unlawfully threatening with a weapon, would not the man have been fully justified to end that threat?
So many cry about a little light.
He's an attorney defending his clients and insisting ICE obey the law, he's not the one who's wrong here.
They are if he says they are, that's not your decision to make.
They do, the constitution guarantees all persons, not citizens, rights on US soil and it has long been upheld in the courts.
You're just a moran that fell for the bait.
KMAO Yes it does, and the Supreme Court agrees. Sucks for your narrative I know, but you catch fish with bait, and the jackass domestic enemies so willing to violate our constitution took the bait.
Deprivation of rights under color of law is a crime, and while Trump has immunity for official acts, like setting up these domestic enemy pieces of shit, they do not.
Not a communist jackass, but God knows you'll project more nonsense.
The proof is the constitution and supreme court rulings jackass, you haven't figured out what this op is yet huh?
KMAO
When did I say that? They're the ones "ruling" not me.
You're mistaken, the domestic enemies violating our rights, constitution, and laws daily are killing America.
America is the land of Liberty, not the land of tyranny.
Kill everyone who's free and wont bow to your bullshit right?
The Dangers of ICE Agents Not Identifying (Documentary) Constitution Officially Suspended Areas
Who will stand for the Constitution? Who will stand for their oath?
It does, by those who pretend to protect liberty. It's happening in from of everyone, yet so few see…
*front
America is We the People, not the government. You want to look at who's destroying America? Look no further than her own government.
>The likes of Lincoln, who put America before himself, are sadly no longer to be found.
Did he though? Do me a favor, define "America" as you're using it.
Joe wasn't in control was he though Trump?
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Like Q said, "Patriots" are in control. Who will stand for the peoples rights? Who will stand for the constitution? Who will stand for their oath?
crickets
They don't want them to know who's image she is.
>Watch the water
The same place they were when gun control and civil asset forfeiture were ok'd, despite being clearly unconstitutional.
>>23209581
He told everyone to pick up their cross and follow Him.
Love the Lord your Got with all your heart, all your soul, and all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. The second is like it, love your neighbor as yourself. All the law and prophets hang on these two commandments.
The Cross.
Anon, they're pulling people over and taking their money with zero suspicion of actual crime, and you have to PROVE your money was not gotten by illegal means, and your bank withdrawal receipt is not enough.
It's not illegal to not trust banks, it's not illegal to use cash for a down payment. It IS illegal for cops to take your money simply because you have it.
Just because the court says it's constitutional doesn't mean it's constitutional. The constitution forbids government from infringing on our rights, that court is government.
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
>>23209655
>As above so below
King of kings and Lord of lords. Are you a king or a lord?
When a son sets you free, you are free indeed.