https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-27/i-dissent-why-one-sec-commissioner-thinks-bitcoin-etf-overdue

Interesting read about a SEC commissioner dissenting on the Bitcoin ETF decision. Suggests SEC is playing gatekeeper on innovation and trying to regulate the underlying asset of the ETF rather than just the ETF which is the extent of their mandate. Furthermore, the decision seems to set a precedent that may backfire because of how other commodity ETFs are structured and their underlying markets are manipulated. It sets a precedent that the SEC is now saying it has approved the underlying asset for those currently in the market and if/when a bitcoin ETF comes to the market, the approval of the ETF would mean essentially that the SEC is approving of Bitcoin.

Sounds like they just fucked themselves in the ass. By blocking one underlying asset, they're now responsible for all of the others! STUPID!!!

>>2321828

Agreed…

The SolidX and the CBOE are two different ETFs, correct? I know there are 5 or so in the works…2 down just this week…

I have a sense that there has to be a coordinated communication with pensions, etc.

There was a closed door meeting with many involved, including the winklevii, earlier this week.

beyond that, while nothing of substance yet, there was a new interesting satoshi claim from last month.

https://nakamotofamilyfoundation.org

If it's legit, I'm thinking that this comes into the story somehow. There's more to bitcoin than meets the eye.

>>2321837

are you betting on BCH??? Seriously? Good luck.

For the truly technical, keep an eye on the decentralized web summit in 3 days…

https://decentralizedweb.net/people/

this is the place. SAFE and SOLID are the projects.

>>2321895

just to be clear, Bitcoin Cash (BCH) has as it's biggest and most well known proponent the fake libertarian/patriot who renounced his US citizenship, Roger Ver.

centimillionaire…if not cryptobillionaire paytriot.

BCH will burn as it's civil war and lack of devs.

>>2321908

Interesting photo of CW for sure…

If he's satoshi, I would expect a more market based approach…in which I still don't see BCH winning.

The alternative is that BTC is NSA or NSA sponsored. Until now, I don't see much proof of anything…

I'm not a BCH fan, but I kind of like CW for some reason. He may be a shill but he's a honey badger shill. Respect your opponent.