why? he blew some shit up and declared victory, while everyone else involved said they are not done yet.
on top of that, why would he want a prize Obama got for just existing?
His ego is still out of control. I predict it will be his downfall.
He also declared he had totally obliterated it and tried to impose peace on Israel and Iran by declaring it. Now others in the world are saying he did not accomplish what he said he did so he has to declare they will never rebuild and the peace lasted less than 6 hours. His credibility is pretty thin at this point.
Anyone else who was lashing out at supporters who, declaring things with great certainty that turn out to be varifiably in you face false, and adding string sayings like 'Thank you for your attention to this matter" to his pronouncements would have anons the person is on the verge of or has already mentally collapsed under the pressure.
It is making me wonder if this Q thing was not only a psyop on patriots who want a plan that can save America, but also a psyop on Trump, making him think the plan was set in stone and he could play his part by just following the script and make pronouncements that would necessarily have to come true.
things that make you go hmmm
you do realize God did not want you to have knowledge of that. obtaining that knowledge was the original sin ( am assuming you are a bible anon since you are going on about good and evil).
if you put a poison apple in on the floor, then put a 2 year old on the floor next to it and said, don't eat that apple, how many two-year-olds would fail? somewhere between 70% and 90% (and that number would go up if you excluded whites and asians). You know that, I know that, are you telling me God did not know he had not prepared an environment safe for his creation? Would you blame the 2 year old for their mistake of eating the apple or the person who put the poison apple and the two year old in the same spot?
If the story is literal, as many bible anons will say it is, they will loose the vast majority thinking people because either the creator of the scenario is the one mostly at fault or the knowledge gained in eating the apple is faulty because use of that judgement leads reasonable thinkers to the conclusion the creator of the situation was at fault and so the knowledge was worthless to begin with. Either way, a literal interpretation vs observing and living in this world are at odds with each other.
a woman with the intellect he gave her.
you are correct we all partake in the judgement Jesus told us not to do. Have you considered how does not judge? Animals. Animals act based on instinct with out judgment. If you go back to the oldest definition of sin (that I have been able to find) it is to act against nature.
So according to the story, God did not want humans to act any way other than as nature intended them to act. Making a judgment as to whether an action is good or evil was the problem.
Do you know who else said the same thing? Buda. Buda encourages you to empty your mind of thoughts and just exist.
Considering the vast majority of monotheist reject anything to do with eastern religions as satanic, it leave some of us who ponder these things in a bit of a quagmire.
First off, is a state of non judgement even desirable? Does God exist in that state (the old testament would suggest otherwise). If god wanted us to exist on the level of animals intellectually, what does that mean? Would humans even want to be in such a state? Are the very low IQ blacks who seem to have not ability to make moral judgments closer to what god had in mind for humanity? Is the salvation you are speaking of bring us back to a state of non judgement? Is that what you want?