>>23233052 pb
>"They don't know what the fuck they're doing" and attending a NATO meeting right?
The key to the ceasefire was in "constraints programming" as edified here beforehand: >>23213579 pb. The main points being that expected constraints be applied at incremental times and tested for integrity, errors, anomalies, or red flags before the next phase is moved to until all satisfactions are met. This technique can also apply to the Russian Ukraine war, where we define milestones at each designated interval until all goals are met. There is major difference between saying we wants both sides to agree to a ceasefire, and laying down expected time constraint checkpoints. I am glad President Trump recognized this point and applied this practice with his own formula. The more specific the checkpoints are, the less ambiguity for each side to adhere to. Hope that makes sense.