Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 10:15 a.m. No.23249596   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9614 >>0214

Cop wants ID for man sitting in his car legally parked on the side of the street. "Do you suspect me of a crime?" - "I suspect you're in a neighborhood you don't belong".

 

This is the United States of America, We the People have FREEDOM to go anywhere we want in public, even if cops think we "don't belong" and FREEDOM to not ID because some stupid cop doesn't think we belong there or "we got a call". Until cops have reasonable articulable suspicion OF A CRIME, not just suspicion, not just "we got a call"โ€ฆ suspicion of A CRIME based on articulable facts and the totality of circumstances, then you have ZERO authority to detain or ID someone. You don't get to harass and ID people because you find their behavior "suspicious", you MUST be able to articulate reasonable suspicion OF A CRIME based on a totality of circumstances and articulable facts supporting reasonable suspicion OF A CRIME. In some states, like Texas, even then you don't get to demand ID until they're lawfully arrested.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 10:26 a.m. No.23249638   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0232

>>23249614

 

Ever notice how many cops act like abusive spouses when people, especially women, don't "obey"?

 

Such big tough strong heroes!!!

 

Cop Slams Handcuffed Woman

 

Think the felony will stick, or you think he'll get off "scott-free"?

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 10:39 a.m. No.23249689   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0283

Lying Cop Sent Woman To Jail - She Gets Paid $650K - Qualified Immunity Revoked - Cops stupid attorney argues she was never "found innocent" they just dropped the charges.

 

Apparently police/government attorneys are too stupid to understand innocent until proven guilty too.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 10:50 a.m. No.23249708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Cop's Ego Couldn't Handle A Simple Laugh, So He Threatened Retaliation.

 

Don't dare insult the "kings" ego!

 

"Am I being detained?" - "Oh you're one of those"

 

Domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States of America and We the People it represents.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 1:08 p.m. No.23250199   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0203

>>23250192

>Jeff is not alone

 

Oh absolutely, the auditing community is growing fast. More people wake up every day as more and more videos are posted every day of cops blatantly violating our rights and laws. That snowball is already rollingโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 1:19 p.m. No.23250219   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0224

When Cops Fight Each Other

 

In the first clip, cop attacks man for being "disrespectful" so female officer pulls him back, male cop grabs her by the throat and pushes her into car.

 

ANY cop that has fits of rage should NOT be a cop, and any cop that uses steroids should not be a cop. Any cop that sees fellow officers "rage" and doesn't do anything or report them are cowards. At least she had the courage to stop him.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 1:49 p.m. No.23250300   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23250283

 

How many are found guilty to be exonerated years later? They were always innocent and were never proven guilty, the courts just locked them up.

 

Innocent until proven guilty. I don't give a flying fuck if a court says someone's guilty when they're innocent. Courts are the biggest fucking hypocrites on the earth.

 

"Do you swear to tell the Truth, the whole Truth, and nothing but the Truth so help you God?"

 

"I do. So anyway Johnโ€ฆ"

 

"NO!!!! You can't tell that part of the Truth! It's inadmissible because I say so!"

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 2:24 p.m. No.23250403   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0437

>>23250390

Correct, if you want your rights respected, you have a RESPONSIBILITY to stand for others rights, even when they don't directly effect you.

 

Cowards only stand when it directly effects them.

 

Law enforcement are evading their responsibility to protect and uphold our rights and laws by violating those rights and laws daily. So are the courts.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 2:26 p.m. No.23250414   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23250405

>Liberty requires permission. Rights are already yours without permission.

 

Pure nonsense, you only need permission if you've allowed yourself to be bound in chains, a chain of command.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 2:52 p.m. No.23250485   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0488 >>0492

>>23250470

Cops, and the courts, need to remember that people have the RIGHT to use necessary force against cops making an unlawful arrest.

 

That right was recognized in common law long before this nation was founded, and recognized long after as a right by the US Supreme Court in Bad Elk v United States.

 

They like to say now it's "bad law" and have tried to remove it by statute in some jurisdictions since it's not specifically enumerated in the constitution, however as per the 9th amendment it doesn't have to be. It's covered under the 4th amendment, and the US Supreme Court recognized it as a right.

Anonymous ID: 1318e9 June 28, 2025, 2:56 p.m. No.23250499   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>23250492

Qualified immunity is an abomination, but that covers them from civil liability, not criminal charges. That's the "thin blue line".

 

Legally in many places a citizen can place a police officer under citizens arrest, but the other cops are gonna turn on you because they blindly back their fellow officer, and likely so will the court.