The ones who are really fucked are the little faggots who think every fantasy cloud that floats by their head is a "RIGHT".
Going by what you display regularly, it's gonna take some rubber bullets and DEW Auditory Disrupters for you to learn the difference between your rights and your fantasies.
Again, your fanciful take on rights is just juvenile and unconvincing. Enumerate and clearly delineate those Rights. As it stands now, your Rights are ephemeral and dependent on whatever you claim are the mystery Rights.
Write them down. Describe the acts required or forbidden by those Rights. Be specific.
You know, our original Bill of Rights is a superb starting point.
The quote "Freedom is wholly unfit for non-religious society" suggests that freedom, particularly in the sense of a stable and ordered liberty that is not reliant on government force, is dependent on a shared moral framework traditiona
The quote, attributed to John implies a belief that a society's stability and adherence to its laws and freedoms require a strong moral foundation.
Adams suggests that without the moral and religious guidance that he considered essential, human passions like avarice, ambition, and revenge would undermine social order and render the constitution inadequate for governance.
Essentially, the statement posits that a non-religious society might lack the inherent moral compass or restraint necessary for freedom to flourish without descending into chaos or social breakdown.
It's important to note that this is a specific perspective, reflecting Adams' personal views and the context of his time. Modern secular societies have demonstrated the possibility of achieving stability and upholding freedoms based on principles of reason, human rights, and democratic processes, rather than solely on religious dogma. Secularism, defined as the separation of religious institutions from state institutions, can be seen as a way to safeguard freedom of religion or belief for all, whether religious or not, by ensuring that the government remains neutral and does not favor any particular religion or impose religion on its citizens.
From John Adams to Massachusetts Militia, 11 October 1798
Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by < [. . .] morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition < and…
National Archives (.gov)
Secularism as a human right: learning from the European Court …
Jun 13, 2024 — Secularism as a human right: learning from the European Court of Human Rights * Abstract. Secularism is conventionally (and somewhat misleadingly) defined as th…
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
Secularism as a Project of Free and Equal Citizenship - PubMed Central
Jun 15, 2022 — The point of secularism's protection of the freedom of conscience and belief is not to allow religion(s) to occupy the political space, but to enable citizens t…
National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)
Was John Adams right when he said our constitution is only for a …
Sep 19, 2018 — * Michael. Studied Liberal Arts (college major) at Kent State University. · 6y. No law or structure will constrain immoral people,