>>23249184 pb

>That is the "THEORY" we are taught, in order to give up our RIGHTS to our Families.

>

>No GOVERNEMENT or STATE has the RIGHT to seize a child. Do you understand that?

>

>If a parent is charged, in a criminal court, for abuse, then it's up to the other family members to step in. "FAMILY" Not GOVERNMENT.

>

>If you understood the corrupt nature of the system, you'd understand it was unconstitutional at the core.

>

>They were able to remove "DUE PROCESS" with a lesser provable case. "Concern".

>

>Who makes a concern? Who decides if a child is actually in danger? What evidence is needed. NONE. There are no EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS. No cross examination, nothing. They bypass Disclosure laws, because they created a term "Confidential". All "CHILD RECORDS" are "CONFIDENTIAL."

>

>You can't see what the social workers wrote, which is mostly here-say from other social workers. What other court, would hand out life sentences, without due process? Many times you're not even allowed in the hearings at all.

>

>They took over and removed "CRIMINAL COURT" rules, and "FAMILY / PROBATE" rules, so any extended family has to obtain PERMISSION through the CORRUPT STATE, who only removes the sellable children, and leave vulnerable children as sacrifices, to "JUSTIFY" their entire existence, created under false pretenses to traffic children, collect federal money.