Unlawful arrest, Cop doesn't understand basic trespass law, violates 4th amendment

Cop admits no crime, but still demands ID. Cops do not get ID because a store wants to ban you from the property, that's a 4th amendment violation. A trespass warning is not a crime. The proper way is for the store to ban them and take their picture, to watch out for them in the future, not for cops WE pay to unlawfully ID or arrest people to make the stores job easier.

Should I be able to tell a cop, "I don't want this person on my property anymore, violate their 4th amendment for me"?

"It's posted! It's posted!" Another cop that thinks some random "sign" a government employee prints out trumps our rights. When that doesn't work, they close down "for lunch".

There are Public Servants and there are government parasites. Public servants are not afraid of the light and being recorded, they know they serve the people. Government parasites hate the light, they believe they're above the people and their will trumps the peoples rights.

>>23257433

Crazy! SGT Makes the WILDEST On-Camera CLAIMS! Cops want ID to trespass warn him (no crime) from property he was never on, for recording on a public sidewalk.

>"You can't turn a constitutionally protected activity into a crime" =="Absolutely we can".

It gets worse. Cop thinks feelings trump rights.

Government parasite in city hall loses it and attacks auditor/journalist (one of three). Shocked when he's arrested "I was told I wouldn't be under arrest" then as he's being cuffed "all three of those motherfuckers are as good as dead".

Public Servants = Not afraid of the light and being exposed, they know they work for and answer to the people.

Government parasite = Afraid of the light and being exposed. They believe they are above the people, like government is a "king" in which they're part and the people have no business checking up on them. Will lecture people on "the right way" to exercise their rights like the guy here who attacked one of them.

Many claim to love freedom, they even think they do, but they hate it with a passion. What they want is a dictatorship that likes and dislikes the same things as them. If they like it, everyone should be "free" to do it. If they don't like it, it should be illegal, and even if it's not it should be and you're wrong because they say so!

We Have Brute Force We Don't Need Law - Cop thinks "we got a call" about you doing something not only legal but constitutionally protected gives them authority to demand ID or arrest you for obstruction for lawfully refusing to ID.

They are domestic enemies to the Constitution of the United States and We the People it represents, not only failing to uphold and defend the peoples rights but violating our rights, constitution, and laws daily across the nation.

Silent Audit - Arrested Recording on Sidewalk, doesn't respond to cops.

Standing on a sidewalk recording, a constitutionally protected freedom. Cops confront him, he stays silent, so they arrest him. So much for the right to remain silent huh? Cop doesn't know the onus of privacy is on the business and claims recording windows from the sidewalk is illegal.

Man honks at oncoming driver coming into his lane, cop near him thinks he honked at him and gets his ego hurt. Pulls him over for "improper use of horn" and then when he tells argues, cops insist on doing field sobriety tests (which are optional in all 50 states and can have no consequences for refusing) telling them to skip that and give him the breathalyzer, which they claim they can't do.

Many people get confused about field sobriety tests (FSTs) and think you have to take them. No, they are optional and they can't retaliate for refusing. FSTs are of absolutely no benefit to the person, as they serve ONLY to build probable case and are 100% subjective. The "implied consent" when you get your license does not apply to FSTs since they're subjective, it applies only to chemical testing. You can't lose your license for refusing an FST.

The reason for them to do the FST rather than breathalyzer is because they wanted to use it for probable cause to arrest him for DUI, which refusing the FST forces them to build probable cause without it.

That's why so many are arrested for DUI when sober, cops claim they "observed" enough to give them probable cause in the FSTs even though they blow zero.

>>23257694

That, vs Jesus setting us free.

>>23257948

It has everything to do with free speech.